Interdisciplinary research is widely considered pivotal to addressing the challenges of modern societies. Accordingly, interdisciplinarity has become prominent in policy discourse for science and higher education (HE). However, little research has explored how interdisciplinarity is considered in governance arrangements of HE systems. This article contributes to this stream of literature by studying the governance of interdisciplinarity at the system level, considering the policy portfolio in a continental European context. Particularly, we investigate whether the policy portfolio in the Italian HE system is consistent towards interdisciplinarity, defining three types of inconsistency: ambiguity, conflict, and incompatibility. Four governance domains are analysed: i) universities’ internal organization, ii) institutional research assessment exercise, iii) doctoral education, and iv) academic recruitment/ careers. We find that although some elements favouring interdisciplinarity have been introduced, a disciplinary rationale still dominates system governance and that the interdisciplinary target is hindered by policy inconsistencies within and between governance domains.

(2017). Inconsistencies in the Governance of Interdisciplinarity: the Case of the Italian Higher Education System [journal article - articolo]. In SCIENCE & PUBLIC POLICY. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/111680

Inconsistencies in the Governance of Interdisciplinarity: the Case of the Italian Higher Education System

Donina, Davide;Paleari, Stefano
2017-01-01

Abstract

Interdisciplinary research is widely considered pivotal to addressing the challenges of modern societies. Accordingly, interdisciplinarity has become prominent in policy discourse for science and higher education (HE). However, little research has explored how interdisciplinarity is considered in governance arrangements of HE systems. This article contributes to this stream of literature by studying the governance of interdisciplinarity at the system level, considering the policy portfolio in a continental European context. Particularly, we investigate whether the policy portfolio in the Italian HE system is consistent towards interdisciplinarity, defining three types of inconsistency: ambiguity, conflict, and incompatibility. Four governance domains are analysed: i) universities’ internal organization, ii) institutional research assessment exercise, iii) doctoral education, and iv) academic recruitment/ careers. We find that although some elements favouring interdisciplinarity have been introduced, a disciplinary rationale still dominates system governance and that the interdisciplinary target is hindered by policy inconsistencies within and between governance domains.
journal article - articolo
2017
Donina, Davide; Seeber, Marco; Paleari, Stefano
(2017). Inconsistencies in the Governance of Interdisciplinarity: the Case of the Italian Higher Education System [journal article - articolo]. In SCIENCE & PUBLIC POLICY. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/111680
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
Donina et al. (2017) - Inconsistencies in the governance of interdisciplinarity - SPP.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 277.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
277.91 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/111680
Citazioni
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact