This paper fills the debate about convergence or divergence in higher education organizational change, analysing university institutional governance reforms and their implementation in two Napoleonic states (Italy and Portugal), a cluster of countries under-researched in comparative perspectives in HE governance literature. We develop a multi-level analysis, first addressing how international concepts have been translated into national laws (‘Gelmini’ reform in Italy and RJIES in Portugal); second assessing how all state universities in both countries implemented them by analysing their new statutes. Our findings show that both states preserve traits of their previous institutional governance model. Past features shape the way countries respond to the transnational model of legitimized university governance. Thus, policy alternatives that prove feasible at a given point in time are limited by the historical-institutional context. Consequently, the concept of organizational allomorphism explains the current pattern in HE institutional governance reform better than both convergence and divergence.

(2018). Convergence or divergence in University institutional governance reforms? Comparing Napoleonic States . Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/124798

Convergence or divergence in University institutional governance reforms? Comparing Napoleonic States

Donina, Davide;Paleari, Stefano
2018-01-01

Abstract

This paper fills the debate about convergence or divergence in higher education organizational change, analysing university institutional governance reforms and their implementation in two Napoleonic states (Italy and Portugal), a cluster of countries under-researched in comparative perspectives in HE governance literature. We develop a multi-level analysis, first addressing how international concepts have been translated into national laws (‘Gelmini’ reform in Italy and RJIES in Portugal); second assessing how all state universities in both countries implemented them by analysing their new statutes. Our findings show that both states preserve traits of their previous institutional governance model. Past features shape the way countries respond to the transnational model of legitimized university governance. Thus, policy alternatives that prove feasible at a given point in time are limited by the historical-institutional context. Consequently, the concept of organizational allomorphism explains the current pattern in HE institutional governance reform better than both convergence and divergence.
2018
Donina, Davide; Bruckmann, Sofia; Paleari, Stefano
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
Donina Bruckmann Paleari (2018) - Convergence or Divergence in Napoleonic state.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 495.37 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
495.37 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/124798
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact