This chapter studies whether underwriters strategically select comparable firms when valuing Initial Public Offerings (IPOs), and whether this behavior varies across industries. The idea is that the bias in the choice of comparable firms by underwriters is expected to increase when there is more discretion, and discretion is largely affected by the issuer’s industry. We first show that the peers selected by underwriters have higher valuations than those obtained from alternative selections, and a significant fraction of peers are replaced from the prospectus to post-IPO reports released by affiliated analysts. Then, we document that this behavior is crucially shaped by industry effects. Valuation bias is more pronounced among technology firms, where the discretion in the selection of peers is higher, and lower in the manufacturing industry. Also, the number of peers changed from the underwriter’s selection to that of affiliated analysts is larger in the technology industry and among more diversified firms.

(2020). The Strategic Behaviour of Underwriters in Valuing IPOs . Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/177035

The Strategic Behaviour of Underwriters in Valuing IPOs

Paleari, Stefano;Vismara, Silvio
2020-01-01

Abstract

This chapter studies whether underwriters strategically select comparable firms when valuing Initial Public Offerings (IPOs), and whether this behavior varies across industries. The idea is that the bias in the choice of comparable firms by underwriters is expected to increase when there is more discretion, and discretion is largely affected by the issuer’s industry. We first show that the peers selected by underwriters have higher valuations than those obtained from alternative selections, and a significant fraction of peers are replaced from the prospectus to post-IPO reports released by affiliated analysts. Then, we document that this behavior is crucially shaped by industry effects. Valuation bias is more pronounced among technology firms, where the discretion in the selection of peers is higher, and lower in the manufacturing industry. Also, the number of peers changed from the underwriter’s selection to that of affiliated analysts is larger in the technology industry and among more diversified firms.
2020
Paleari, Stefano; Signori, Andrea; Vismara, Silvio
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
c14.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 455.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
455.08 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/177035
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact