The aim of this paper is to verify if the referential ambiguity induced by intensional verbs (xotet’, želat’, trebovat’, prosit’, ždat’, iskat’, bojat’sja …) can be resolved in Russian by grammatical means, assigning accusative case to [+ specific] objects and genitive case to [- specific] objects (Partee 2005), or accusative case to [± specific] objects and genitive case [- specific] objects (Kagan 2005). This hypothesis is verified on the basis of empirical data, by analizing a corpus of 476 concrete occurrences of the VP ždat’ avtobus.
(2008). Ja ždu avtobus: i verbi intensionali in russo tra norma e uso [journal article - articolo]. In LINGUISTICA E FILOLOGIA. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/184
Ja ždu avtobus: i verbi intensionali in russo tra norma e uso
2008-01-01
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to verify if the referential ambiguity induced by intensional verbs (xotet’, želat’, trebovat’, prosit’, ždat’, iskat’, bojat’sja …) can be resolved in Russian by grammatical means, assigning accusative case to [+ specific] objects and genitive case to [- specific] objects (Partee 2005), or accusative case to [± specific] objects and genitive case [- specific] objects (Kagan 2005). This hypothesis is verified on the basis of empirical data, by analizing a corpus of 476 concrete occurrences of the VP ždat’ avtobus.| File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
LeF26(2008)Benigni.pdf
accesso aperto
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione del file
223.94 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
223.94 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo
