This article investigates whether certain organizational arrangements in (local) public appointment processes could encourage the use of appointments as a tool of good governance rather than as a tool of patronage. Specifically, we studied the role of six organizational arrangements in 10 case studies of intra- and inter-organizational public appointment processes held in Italian local government. We found that good governance (in terms of perception of overall integrity and fairness) was found in processes of public appointments where there was independent scrutiny, and when the process involved local councillors and/or external stakeholders – that is, actors beyond those with the formal power to appoint. In these cases, making appointments was seen as a tool of good governance rather than of patronage. These organizational arrangements were more relevant than other ones such as the transparency of public advertisements, job descriptions and educational/professional requirements, and media and public awareness. The article describes the relevant literature and the research study, and discusses implications for research, policy and management.

(2018). Between patronage and good governance: Organizational arrangements in (local) public appointment processes [journal article - articolo]. In INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/83066

Between patronage and good governance: Organizational arrangements in (local) public appointment processes

Sicilia, Mariafrancesca;
2018-01-01

Abstract

This article investigates whether certain organizational arrangements in (local) public appointment processes could encourage the use of appointments as a tool of good governance rather than as a tool of patronage. Specifically, we studied the role of six organizational arrangements in 10 case studies of intra- and inter-organizational public appointment processes held in Italian local government. We found that good governance (in terms of perception of overall integrity and fairness) was found in processes of public appointments where there was independent scrutiny, and when the process involved local councillors and/or external stakeholders – that is, actors beyond those with the formal power to appoint. In these cases, making appointments was seen as a tool of good governance rather than of patronage. These organizational arrangements were more relevant than other ones such as the transparency of public advertisements, job descriptions and educational/professional requirements, and media and public awareness. The article describes the relevant literature and the research study, and discusses implications for research, policy and management.
articolo
2018
Sancino, Alessandro; Sicilia, Mariafrancesca; Grossi, Giuseppe
(2018). Between patronage and good governance: Organizational arrangements in (local) public appointment processes [journal article - articolo]. In INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/83066
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
IRAS_2017_Sancino et al.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 169.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
169.08 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/83066
Citazioni
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact