In recent years, philanthropic venture capital (PhVC) has developed as a new financing model for social entrepreneurship. First presented by Letts et al. in 1997, PhVC is the application of the venture capital (VC) strategies and techniques to the financing of social enterprises (SE). Like venture capitalists (VCs), PhVCs have developed specialized abilities in selecting entrepreneurial projects. However, while VCs select deals in terms of shareholder value maximization (Amit et al., 1998), PhVCs engage in a partnership aiming at maximizing social impact. Because of the few PhVCs and the high engagement philosophy, a limited number of SE receive support after a tough selection process. Despite the growing interest in PhVC, no study has investigated its selection. Specifically, it is unclear: a) which variables are considered; b) their degree of importance; and c) the relationship with VC variables (Kaplan and Stromberg, 2000). Additionally, no research exists on whether different types of PhVCs consider different screening variables and the existence of differences in US and European selection process.

(2009). How Do Philanthropic Venture Capitalists Choose Their Portfolio Companies? . Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/150962

How Do Philanthropic Venture Capitalists Choose Their Portfolio Companies?

Scarlata, Maria Rosa;
2009-01-01

Abstract

In recent years, philanthropic venture capital (PhVC) has developed as a new financing model for social entrepreneurship. First presented by Letts et al. in 1997, PhVC is the application of the venture capital (VC) strategies and techniques to the financing of social enterprises (SE). Like venture capitalists (VCs), PhVCs have developed specialized abilities in selecting entrepreneurial projects. However, while VCs select deals in terms of shareholder value maximization (Amit et al., 1998), PhVCs engage in a partnership aiming at maximizing social impact. Because of the few PhVCs and the high engagement philosophy, a limited number of SE receive support after a tough selection process. Despite the growing interest in PhVC, no study has investigated its selection. Specifically, it is unclear: a) which variables are considered; b) their degree of importance; and c) the relationship with VC variables (Kaplan and Stromberg, 2000). Additionally, no research exists on whether different types of PhVCs consider different screening variables and the existence of differences in US and European selection process.
2009
Scarlata, Maria Rosa Giovanna; Alemany, Luisa
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
ssrn.1343563.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 124.63 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
124.63 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/150962
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact