Asking circular questions is a systemic psychotherapeutic technique (Selvini Palazzoli, 1980; Tomm, 1988) aimed to invite patients and family members to consider others’ point of view and hypotheses on relationships and problems complained. Unlike the linear questions aimed at expressing the preexisting beliefs about facts and people, circular questions should help people to reflect on others’ thoughts and feelings, to perceive their own thoughts and feelings as relative and susceptible of change, and to allow new views and interpretations on events and relational dynamics. As very few studies investigated the effect of this kind of questions we sought to study if they promote mentalization and reflective narratives. We administered to 120 non-clinical participants the Basic Empathy Scale (BES) and the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ-8) as baseline assessment. Afterward we asked four questions about participants' life episodes and personality; to a half of participants (Circular Questions Group) the questions were formulated in a circular form, to the other half (Lineal Questions Group) in the lineal form. At the end, both groups took the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) and completed the Metacognitive Functioning Screening Scale (MFSS-30). Also, the answers of both groups were transcribed and analyzed through some computerized measures of linguistic style (Bucci, 2002). At the baseline assessment the two groups did not differ in BES and RFQ scores, while after answering questions the Circular Questions Group showed significant higher scores in RMET (t = -7.903, p < .001) and in the Emotion Recognition subscale of MFSS-30 (t = -2.344, p < .05). Moreover, the narratives told by the Circular Questions Group were more abstract (t = -3.463, p < .001). Circular questions seem to be a potential asset for the therapeutic process as they highly foster the others’ emotion recognition and increase the abstract reflection in people narratives.

(2019). Circular questions compared to lineal ones elicit more abstract narratives and greater emotion recognition . In MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/153193

Circular questions compared to lineal ones elicit more abstract narratives and greater emotion recognition

Negri, Atta' Ambrogio Maria;Belotti, Luca
2019-01-01

Abstract

Asking circular questions is a systemic psychotherapeutic technique (Selvini Palazzoli, 1980; Tomm, 1988) aimed to invite patients and family members to consider others’ point of view and hypotheses on relationships and problems complained. Unlike the linear questions aimed at expressing the preexisting beliefs about facts and people, circular questions should help people to reflect on others’ thoughts and feelings, to perceive their own thoughts and feelings as relative and susceptible of change, and to allow new views and interpretations on events and relational dynamics. As very few studies investigated the effect of this kind of questions we sought to study if they promote mentalization and reflective narratives. We administered to 120 non-clinical participants the Basic Empathy Scale (BES) and the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ-8) as baseline assessment. Afterward we asked four questions about participants' life episodes and personality; to a half of participants (Circular Questions Group) the questions were formulated in a circular form, to the other half (Lineal Questions Group) in the lineal form. At the end, both groups took the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) and completed the Metacognitive Functioning Screening Scale (MFSS-30). Also, the answers of both groups were transcribed and analyzed through some computerized measures of linguistic style (Bucci, 2002). At the baseline assessment the two groups did not differ in BES and RFQ scores, while after answering questions the Circular Questions Group showed significant higher scores in RMET (t = -7.903, p < .001) and in the Emotion Recognition subscale of MFSS-30 (t = -2.344, p < .05). Moreover, the narratives told by the Circular Questions Group were more abstract (t = -3.463, p < .001). Circular questions seem to be a potential asset for the therapeutic process as they highly foster the others’ emotion recognition and increase the abstract reflection in people narratives.
2019
Inglese
Proceedings XXI National Congress Italian Psychological Association, Clinical and Dynamic Section, Milan-27-29 September 2019, SYMPOSIUM SESSION
Bottini, Marta; Carnelli, Letizia; Di Sarno, Marco; Perego, Gaia; Tognasso, Giacomo
7
2 (suppl.)
199
200
online
Italy
Messina
University of Messina
comitato scientifico
XXI National Congress Italian Psychological Association, Clinical and Dynamic Section
XXI
Milan
27-29 September 2019
Università di Messina
internazionale
contributo
Settore M-PSI/07 - Psicologia Dinamica
Circular questions; systems thinking; referential process; emotion recognition; psychotherapeutic techniques
testo scaricabile alla pagina http://cab.unime.it/journals/index.php/MJCP/article/view/2267/pdf
Negri, Atta' Ambrogio Maria; Belotti, Luca
open
2
1.4 Contributi in atti di convegno - Contributions in conference proceedings::1.4.02 Abstract in atti di convegno - Conference abstracts
Non definito
274
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
(2019). Circular questions compared to lineal ones elicit more abstract narratives and greater emotion recognition . In MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/153193
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
Atti pubblicati AIP 2019.pdf

accesso aperto

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione del file 2.31 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.31 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/153193
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact