The shift of the English language from synthetic to analytic is still often attributed to contact: with Scandinavian – e.g., Poussa (1982) – or with early Brittonic – e.g., Tristram (2002); on the other hand, others – e.g., Diensberg (1998) and Mufwene (2000) – point to the Norman Conquest as the turning point in the history of the language. Both assumptions, however, seem to be basically unwarranted, because (i) ‘attrition’ was definitely very limited, and (ii) because natural phonological processes had dramatic consequences on morphology. West Saxon itself was already weakly inflecting, and a considerable number of endings were absolutely ambiguous and, therefore, practically useless. Moreover, a considerable reduction in the number and type of inflectional categories had been a feature of Proto-Germanic in comparison with Indo-European. What is argued here is that Old English was in a very unstable equilibrium, and contact (especially with Norman French) can at best have accelerated its progress towards analyticity, but certainly did not trigger it. In terms of Complexity Theory, English did not undergo ‘sudden ignition’ (Nicolis & Prigogine 1989: 175), but rather a steady loss of systemic stability. All these changes can be explained if we apply Naturalness Theory, and the Theory of Complex systems, and that is the main purpose of my paper.
Il passaggio dell’inglese dal tipo flessivo a quello analitico è stato spesso attribuito al contatto con le varietà celtiche o con quelle dei popoli che successivamente invasero l’Inghilterra (Scandinavi e Normanni). Tuttavia, l’influenza di quelle lingue sembra essere stata marginale dal punto di vista delle conseguenze che esse ebbero sulle strutture (diverso, ovviamente, è il caso del lessico) e tale cambiamento tipologico fu dovuto piuttosto ad una lunga e complessa serie di processi fonologici naturali che, come spesso succede, ebbero conseguenze catastrofiche sulla morfologia. Del resto, già il proto-germanico aveva un numero di categorie morfologiche inferiore rispetto all’indoeuropeo. In questo articolo, l’autore sostiene che l’inglese antico era in uno stato di equilibrio instabile e che il contatto può, al massimo, aver accelerato il passaggio al tipo analitico. Tali cambiamenti morfologici e tipologici possono essere spiegati applicando la Morfologia naturale e la Teoria della Complessità.
(2007). Contact vs. internal dynamics in the typological shift of English [journal article - articolo]. In LINGUISTICA E FILOLOGIA. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/101
Contact vs. internal dynamics in the typological shift of English
2007-01-01
Abstract
The shift of the English language from synthetic to analytic is still often attributed to contact: with Scandinavian – e.g., Poussa (1982) – or with early Brittonic – e.g., Tristram (2002); on the other hand, others – e.g., Diensberg (1998) and Mufwene (2000) – point to the Norman Conquest as the turning point in the history of the language. Both assumptions, however, seem to be basically unwarranted, because (i) ‘attrition’ was definitely very limited, and (ii) because natural phonological processes had dramatic consequences on morphology. West Saxon itself was already weakly inflecting, and a considerable number of endings were absolutely ambiguous and, therefore, practically useless. Moreover, a considerable reduction in the number and type of inflectional categories had been a feature of Proto-Germanic in comparison with Indo-European. What is argued here is that Old English was in a very unstable equilibrium, and contact (especially with Norman French) can at best have accelerated its progress towards analyticity, but certainly did not trigger it. In terms of Complexity Theory, English did not undergo ‘sudden ignition’ (Nicolis & Prigogine 1989: 175), but rather a steady loss of systemic stability. All these changes can be explained if we apply Naturalness Theory, and the Theory of Complex systems, and that is the main purpose of my paper.File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
LeF25(2007)Bertacca.pdf
accesso aperto
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione del file
175.71 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
175.71 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo