Giovanni Bottiroli’s article “Frankenstein Rather Than Faust?” aims to problematize and investigate further the challenge to the notion of “rigid identity”. In order to do so, Bottiroli dismantles a univocal understanding of “identity”, bringing to light the polisemy and porosity intrinsic to this term. The author discusses here different modes of identity, concentrating on two in particular: coincidence and non-coincidence with oneself. Taking this distinction as his point of departure, Bottiroli applies these interpretative frameworks to two of the most significant figures of Western imagination, Frankenstein and Faust.
(2017). Frankenstein rather than Faust? The decline of limit-surpassing forces [journal article - articolo]. In ENTHYMEMA. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/119286
Frankenstein rather than Faust? The decline of limit-surpassing forces
Bottiroli, Giovanni
2017-01-01
Abstract
Giovanni Bottiroli’s article “Frankenstein Rather Than Faust?” aims to problematize and investigate further the challenge to the notion of “rigid identity”. In order to do so, Bottiroli dismantles a univocal understanding of “identity”, bringing to light the polisemy and porosity intrinsic to this term. The author discusses here different modes of identity, concentrating on two in particular: coincidence and non-coincidence with oneself. Taking this distinction as his point of departure, Bottiroli applies these interpretative frameworks to two of the most significant figures of Western imagination, Frankenstein and Faust.File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Bottiroli - Frankenstein rather than Faust.pdf
accesso aperto
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione del file
203.56 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
203.56 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo