Since the early Ninetiesthere has been a significantscientific acknowledgment of the importance of self-determination in the education of persons with disabilities. This corpus of research concerns almost exclusively the theoretical aspects ofthe construct and only a few studies have empirically dealt with evaluating the actual level of self-determination of people with disabilities and/or the impact that psycho-educational interventions and supports have in promoting self-determined behaviours. In order to investigate the empirical researchesthat analyse how the construct isinterpreted by the insiders and which of its components are actually taken into consideration,the present contribution, using the research methodology of the systematic review, intends to address this gap carrying out a survey of the quantitative tools most used by psycho-pedagogical research for the assessment of self-determination in adults with intellectual disabilities. The paper confirmsthe lack in literature of researches exclusively dedicated to the quantitative tools used to assess self-determination and its specific components. This represents, finally, a priority for the growth of knowledge related to the construct, as well as of most evidence-based interventions and supports necessary to develop, implement and guarantee self-determination in adults with intellectual disabilities.

(2018). Strumenti per valutare il costrutto di autodeterminazione e le sue componenti nella disabilità intellettiva adulta: una systematic review [journal article - articolo]. In ITALIAN JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION FOR INCLUSION. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/135289

Strumenti per valutare il costrutto di autodeterminazione e le sue componenti nella disabilità intellettiva adulta: una systematic review

Sacchi, Fabio;Giraldo, Mabel
2018-01-01

Abstract

Since the early Ninetiesthere has been a significantscientific acknowledgment of the importance of self-determination in the education of persons with disabilities. This corpus of research concerns almost exclusively the theoretical aspects ofthe construct and only a few studies have empirically dealt with evaluating the actual level of self-determination of people with disabilities and/or the impact that psycho-educational interventions and supports have in promoting self-determined behaviours. In order to investigate the empirical researchesthat analyse how the construct isinterpreted by the insiders and which of its components are actually taken into consideration,the present contribution, using the research methodology of the systematic review, intends to address this gap carrying out a survey of the quantitative tools most used by psycho-pedagogical research for the assessment of self-determination in adults with intellectual disabilities. The paper confirmsthe lack in literature of researches exclusively dedicated to the quantitative tools used to assess self-determination and its specific components. This represents, finally, a priority for the growth of knowledge related to the construct, as well as of most evidence-based interventions and supports necessary to develop, implement and guarantee self-determination in adults with intellectual disabilities.
articolo
2018
Sacchi, Fabio; Giraldo, Mabel
(2018). Strumenti per valutare il costrutto di autodeterminazione e le sue componenti nella disabilità intellettiva adulta: una systematic review [journal article - articolo]. In ITALIAN JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION FOR INCLUSION. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/135289
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
043 • Giraldo-Sacchi.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: postprint - versione referata/accettata senza referaggio
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 1 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/135289
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact