The paper argues that Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Sozialwissenschaften (The Past and Future of the Social Sciences), a contribution not always well understood in the literature, is important to an understanding of Schumpeter’s concept of develop- ment as applied to the field of the social sciences. To this end, it addresses three key questions. First, can the book be taken as a starting point to reconstruct a Schumpeterian theory of scientific development? Second, is Vergangenheit und Zukunft merely ‘a brief outline of what first became the Epochen [der Dogmen- und Methodengeschichte] and finally the History of Economic Analysis’, as Elizabeth Boody Schumpeter wrote in her Editor’s Introduction (July 1952) to the latter work (p. XXXII), or should it be read as a complement to Epochen and perhaps the History? Third, is the eminent Japanese scholar Shionoya right to claim that Schumpeter’s work pursued the ambitious goal of developing a ‘comprehensive sociology’?

(2019). The past and future of the social sciences. A Schumpeterian theory of scientific development? [journal article - articolo]. In CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/136440

The past and future of the social sciences. A Schumpeterian theory of scientific development?

Lucarelli, Stefano;
2019-01-01

Abstract

The paper argues that Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Sozialwissenschaften (The Past and Future of the Social Sciences), a contribution not always well understood in the literature, is important to an understanding of Schumpeter’s concept of develop- ment as applied to the field of the social sciences. To this end, it addresses three key questions. First, can the book be taken as a starting point to reconstruct a Schumpeterian theory of scientific development? Second, is Vergangenheit und Zukunft merely ‘a brief outline of what first became the Epochen [der Dogmen- und Methodengeschichte] and finally the History of Economic Analysis’, as Elizabeth Boody Schumpeter wrote in her Editor’s Introduction (July 1952) to the latter work (p. XXXII), or should it be read as a complement to Epochen and perhaps the History? Third, is the eminent Japanese scholar Shionoya right to claim that Schumpeter’s work pursued the ambitious goal of developing a ‘comprehensive sociology’?
articolo
2019
Lucarelli, Stefano; Giuliani, Alfonso; Baron, Hervé
(2019). The past and future of the social sciences. A Schumpeterian theory of scientific development? [journal article - articolo]. In CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/136440
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
bez001.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 213.78 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
213.78 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/136440
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact