We analyse the determinants of labour productivity across (a sample of) EA member states. We focus on the divergent dynamics before and after the financial crisis, and of core countries relative to peripheral countries. We ground our empirical analysis in Paolo Sylos‐Labini's productivity equations. We test different models, including a Panel 2S‐LS model and a Panel vector autoregression model. Our preliminary findings confirm and strengthen Sylos‐Labini's main insights. Labour productivity in manufacturing industries is strongly and positively correlated with the market size (Smith effect), the relative cost of labour (Ricardo effect), the absolute cost of labour (organization effect) and past investment, whereas it is negatively correlated with current investment. Furthermore, we find evidence that the crisis has affected the size of these effects. Focusing on the core periphery dichotomy, the signs of the effects are the same for both groups of countries, although the Smith, Ricardo and long‐run investment effects are usually stronger for core countries compared to peripheral countries. The opposite holds for the organization effect, while investment effects are less clear.
(2020). Productivity growth, Smith effects and Ricardo effects in Euro Area's manufacturing industries [journal article - articolo]. In METROECONOMICA. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/143956
Productivity growth, Smith effects and Ricardo effects in Euro Area's manufacturing industries
Lucarelli, Stefano;
2020-01-01
Abstract
We analyse the determinants of labour productivity across (a sample of) EA member states. We focus on the divergent dynamics before and after the financial crisis, and of core countries relative to peripheral countries. We ground our empirical analysis in Paolo Sylos‐Labini's productivity equations. We test different models, including a Panel 2S‐LS model and a Panel vector autoregression model. Our preliminary findings confirm and strengthen Sylos‐Labini's main insights. Labour productivity in manufacturing industries is strongly and positively correlated with the market size (Smith effect), the relative cost of labour (Ricardo effect), the absolute cost of labour (organization effect) and past investment, whereas it is negatively correlated with current investment. Furthermore, we find evidence that the crisis has affected the size of these effects. Focusing on the core periphery dichotomy, the signs of the effects are the same for both groups of countries, although the Smith, Ricardo and long‐run investment effects are usually stronger for core countries compared to peripheral countries. The opposite holds for the organization effect, while investment effects are less clear.File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
meca.12270.pdf
Solo gestori di archivio
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file
2.18 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.18 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Lucarelli 143956.pdf
Open Access dal 29/08/2020
Versione:
postprint - versione referata/accettata senza referaggio
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione del file
894.25 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
894.25 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo