This chapter addresses three issues in Green Human Resource Management (GHRM), namely how it balances control and commitment, its political meanings, and its ethical assumptions. It provides the implications of these issues for human resource management (HRM) researchers and practitioners. The dichotomy between commitment and control has characterized the evolution of organization studies and of the HRM field in particular. However, the rhetorical shift from personnel management to HRM is considered as an ideological reconfiguration of the field, which creates room for more sophisticated forms of managerial control. The critical management studies community has deeply explored the political connotation of the systems, highlighting how the growing orientation of corporations towards environmental sustainability can be conceived as a hegemonic move. As a consequence, ethics contributions point out the need to simultaneously address 'the three justice dimensions of sustainability: intragenerational justice, intergenerational justice, and justice towards nature'.

(2018). Employee control, ethics and politics - GHRM in context . Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/146801

Employee control, ethics and politics - GHRM in context

Carollo, Luca;
2018-01-01

Abstract

This chapter addresses three issues in Green Human Resource Management (GHRM), namely how it balances control and commitment, its political meanings, and its ethical assumptions. It provides the implications of these issues for human resource management (HRM) researchers and practitioners. The dichotomy between commitment and control has characterized the evolution of organization studies and of the HRM field in particular. However, the rhetorical shift from personnel management to HRM is considered as an ideological reconfiguration of the field, which creates room for more sophisticated forms of managerial control. The critical management studies community has deeply explored the political connotation of the systems, highlighting how the growing orientation of corporations towards environmental sustainability can be conceived as a hegemonic move. As a consequence, ethics contributions point out the need to simultaneously address 'the three justice dimensions of sustainability: intragenerational justice, intergenerational justice, and justice towards nature'.
2018
Carollo, Luca; Guerci, Marco
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
DEFINITIVO8_22_RoutledgeGHRM2016CarolloandGuerci.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: postprint - versione referata/accettata senza referaggio
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 239.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
239.02 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/146801
Citazioni
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact