The paper analyses the two judgments (decision no. 207/2018 and decision no. 242/2019) of the Italian Constitutional Court concerning the so-called “Cappato case”. The paper focuses on the evolution of the double-decision so-called “doppia-pronuncia”, which in this constitutional trial becomes a two-step decision. By framing these issues, the paper addresses the following questions. Why does the Court decide to postpone the decision? Can we recognise a connection between the first and the second judgment? How this new pattern of deciding may impact the effectiveness of the monito-decision?
(2019). Caso Cappato-Antoniani: analisi di un nuovo modulo monitorio [journal article - articolo]. In OSSERVATORIO COSTITUZIONALE. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/152801
Caso Cappato-Antoniani: analisi di un nuovo modulo monitorio
Pescatore, Rita
2019-01-01
Abstract
The paper analyses the two judgments (decision no. 207/2018 and decision no. 242/2019) of the Italian Constitutional Court concerning the so-called “Cappato case”. The paper focuses on the evolution of the double-decision so-called “doppia-pronuncia”, which in this constitutional trial becomes a two-step decision. By framing these issues, the paper addresses the following questions. Why does the Court decide to postpone the decision? Can we recognise a connection between the first and the second judgment? How this new pattern of deciding may impact the effectiveness of the monito-decision?| File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2020_1_03_Pescatore.pdf
Solo gestori di archivio
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file
339.66 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
339.66 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo
