This paper investigates whether gender, age, ethnicity, and geography affect the choice of equity crowdfunding offerings vs initial public offerings (IPO) on traditional stock markets and whether these characteristics increase the likelihood of a successful offering. Using 167 equity offerings in Crowdcube and 99 equity offerings on London’s Alternative Investment Market raising between £300,000 and £5 m, we find that companies with younger top management team (TMT) members are both more likely to launch equity crowdfunding offerings than IPOs and have higher chances to successfully complete an equity crowdfunding offering. Remotely located companies are more likely to launch equity crowdfunding offerings than IPOs and have higher chances to successfully complete an equity crowdfunding offering. On the contrary, female entrepreneurs do not have higher chances to raise funds in equity crowdfunding. Minority entrepreneurs do not have higher chances of successfully raising capital but do attract a higher number of investors. Overall, our evidence provides empirical guidance for the first time to the oft-repeated policy claim that equity crowdfunding democratizes entrepreneurial finance by providing access to funding to underrepresented groups of potential entrepreneurs.

(2021). Does equity crowdfunding democratize entrepreneurial finance? [journal article - articolo]. In SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/153130

Does equity crowdfunding democratize entrepreneurial finance?

Meoli, Michele;Vismara, Silvio
2021-01-01

Abstract

This paper investigates whether gender, age, ethnicity, and geography affect the choice of equity crowdfunding offerings vs initial public offerings (IPO) on traditional stock markets and whether these characteristics increase the likelihood of a successful offering. Using 167 equity offerings in Crowdcube and 99 equity offerings on London’s Alternative Investment Market raising between £300,000 and £5 m, we find that companies with younger top management team (TMT) members are both more likely to launch equity crowdfunding offerings than IPOs and have higher chances to successfully complete an equity crowdfunding offering. Remotely located companies are more likely to launch equity crowdfunding offerings than IPOs and have higher chances to successfully complete an equity crowdfunding offering. On the contrary, female entrepreneurs do not have higher chances to raise funds in equity crowdfunding. Minority entrepreneurs do not have higher chances of successfully raising capital but do attract a higher number of investors. Overall, our evidence provides empirical guidance for the first time to the oft-repeated policy claim that equity crowdfunding democratizes entrepreneurial finance by providing access to funding to underrepresented groups of potential entrepreneurs.
CCSE - CISAlpino Institute for Comparative Studies in Europe
articolo
15-apr-2019
3-giu-2019
2021
Inglese
cartaceo
online
56
2
533
552
esperti anonimi
Settore ING-IND/35 - Ingegneria Economico-Gestionale
Crowdfunding; Entrepreneurship; Finance democratization; Non-bank financial institutions
Cumming, Douglas John; Meoli, Michele; Vismara, Silvio
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
reserved
(2021). Does equity crowdfunding democratize entrepreneurial finance? [journal article - articolo]. In SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/153130
Non definito
3
1.1 Contributi in rivista - Journal contributions::1.1.01 Articoli/Saggi in rivista - Journal Articles/Essays
262
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
Cumming2019_Article_DoesEquityCrowdfundingDemocrat.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 413.12 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
413.12 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/153130
Citazioni
  • Scopus 217
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 196
social impact