Differences in investor motivations have been largely neglected as a topic in the literature on socially responsible investment. Most research studies consider all investors as a homogeneous group. This chapter aims to contribute to the strand of literature that focuses on dissimilarities. Particular attention is given to motivations that drive individual investors toward socially responsible investment. Motivations, in fact, may influence the financial instruments chosen, the strategy adopted, the amount of money invested, and the level and direction of the trade-off between the two main sources of utility for ethical investors, which are ethics and profit. Furthermore, the concept of “ethical intensity” is introduced to achieve a better understanding of investors’ willingness and effective choice with regard to the ethical investment process. The suggested components of “ethical intensity” are (a) “proximity,” that is, the closeness of an investment’s ethical criteria to an investor’s ethical set of values or moral justification; (b) “social efficacy,” such as the perceived ability to encourage social change; (c) “centrality,” that is, the “position” of the investor in the process; and (d) the temporal immediacy (“urgency”).
(2020). Socially Responsible Investors: Exploring Motivations and Ethical Intensity . Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/162857
Socially Responsible Investors: Exploring Motivations and Ethical Intensity
Signori, Silvana
2020-01-01
Abstract
Differences in investor motivations have been largely neglected as a topic in the literature on socially responsible investment. Most research studies consider all investors as a homogeneous group. This chapter aims to contribute to the strand of literature that focuses on dissimilarities. Particular attention is given to motivations that drive individual investors toward socially responsible investment. Motivations, in fact, may influence the financial instruments chosen, the strategy adopted, the amount of money invested, and the level and direction of the trade-off between the two main sources of utility for ethical investors, which are ethics and profit. Furthermore, the concept of “ethical intensity” is introduced to achieve a better understanding of investors’ willingness and effective choice with regard to the ethical investment process. The suggested components of “ethical intensity” are (a) “proximity,” that is, the closeness of an investment’s ethical criteria to an investor’s ethical set of values or moral justification; (b) “social efficacy,” such as the perceived ability to encourage social change; (c) “centrality,” that is, the “position” of the investor in the process; and (d) the temporal immediacy (“urgency”).File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Signori2020_ReferenceWorkEntry_SociallyResponsibleInvestors.pdf
Solo gestori di archivio
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file
349.24 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
349.24 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo