Almost 40% of the European building stock is in need of major energy, structural, and architectural upgrades and is responsible for a significant impact on the environment. Recent research has thus highlighted the need for a new sustainable approach for upgrading existing buildings which are technically sound while fostering safety and environmental, social, and economic sustainability. In this paper, a new method for the design of alternative solutions for a sustainable seismic upgrade of existing RC buildings is proposed. New principles for the design of sustainable and feasible structural solutions are first defined and translated into qualitative criteria and quantitative design target demand parameters to be used in a first pre-screening of possible interventions and in a following multi-objective Performance Based Design (PBD) method. A 4-step procedure for the design of alternative dissipative and high-strength exoskeletons is then presented, which enables the design of solutions leading to equivalent seismic performances of the retrofitted buildings. The proposed method is finally applied to a typical post-WWII RC building, and merits and shortcomings of dissipative and high-strength solutions are discussed. It is found that the proposed approach is capable of enforcing sustainability-driven criteria effectively for all the proposed solutions.

(2020). Design of dissipative and elastic high-strength exoskeleton solutions for sustainable seismic upgrades of existing RC buildings [journal article - articolo]. In ENGINEERING STRUCTURES. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/172299

Design of dissipative and elastic high-strength exoskeleton solutions for sustainable seismic upgrades of existing RC buildings

Passoni, C.;Marini, A.;Riva, P.
2020-01-01

Abstract

Almost 40% of the European building stock is in need of major energy, structural, and architectural upgrades and is responsible for a significant impact on the environment. Recent research has thus highlighted the need for a new sustainable approach for upgrading existing buildings which are technically sound while fostering safety and environmental, social, and economic sustainability. In this paper, a new method for the design of alternative solutions for a sustainable seismic upgrade of existing RC buildings is proposed. New principles for the design of sustainable and feasible structural solutions are first defined and translated into qualitative criteria and quantitative design target demand parameters to be used in a first pre-screening of possible interventions and in a following multi-objective Performance Based Design (PBD) method. A 4-step procedure for the design of alternative dissipative and high-strength exoskeletons is then presented, which enables the design of solutions leading to equivalent seismic performances of the retrofitted buildings. The proposed method is finally applied to a typical post-WWII RC building, and merits and shortcomings of dissipative and high-strength solutions are discussed. It is found that the proposed approach is capable of enforcing sustainability-driven criteria effectively for all the proposed solutions.
articolo
2020
Passoni, Chiara; Guo, J.; Christopoulos, C.; Marini, Alessandra; Riva, Paolo
(2020). Design of dissipative and elastic high-strength exoskeleton solutions for sustainable seismic upgrades of existing RC buildings [journal article - articolo]. In ENGINEERING STRUCTURES. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/172299
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
1-s2.0-S014102961933202X-main.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 9.37 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
9.37 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/172299
Citazioni
  • Scopus 33
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact