Literature regarding attitudes towards procreative options in the event of infertility is highly limited. The general aim of the current cross-sectional study is to analyze the relation between basic, personal values (self-enhancement and self-transcendence), and procreative options (living without children, adoption, homologous techniques, and heterologous techniques), while exploring the role of religiosity in moderating this relation. A large sample of 1,891 young Italian adults aged between 18 and 33 was used in the study. The participants were asked to complete a self-report questionnaire. A series of hierarchical regression models were constructed using the SPSS 24.0 software, in order to test the moderation hypotheses. Self-enhancement values were positively related to the choice of both homologous and heterologous techniques, whereas self-transcendence values were strong and positive predictors of adoption. Moreover, a significant moderating role of religiosity in shaping the relations between personal values and attitudes towards heterologous techniques emerged: at low levels of self-enhancement values, highly religious participants had a more negative attitude towards heterologous techniques compared to participants with low religiosity. However, self-transcendence values predicted a more positive attitude towards heterologous techniques among participants with low religiosity. Findings showed the link between personal values and attitudes towards assisted reproductive techniques and adoption, along with the role of religiosity in shaping this relation; heterologous techniques were the most controversial option according to participants’ perceptions.

(2020). Attitudes towards procreative options in the event of infertility: The role of personal values and religiosity [journal article - articolo]. In THE OPEN PSYCHOLOGY JOURNAL. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/174908

Attitudes towards procreative options in the event of infertility: The role of personal values and religiosity

Barni, Daniela
2020-01-01

Abstract

Literature regarding attitudes towards procreative options in the event of infertility is highly limited. The general aim of the current cross-sectional study is to analyze the relation between basic, personal values (self-enhancement and self-transcendence), and procreative options (living without children, adoption, homologous techniques, and heterologous techniques), while exploring the role of religiosity in moderating this relation. A large sample of 1,891 young Italian adults aged between 18 and 33 was used in the study. The participants were asked to complete a self-report questionnaire. A series of hierarchical regression models were constructed using the SPSS 24.0 software, in order to test the moderation hypotheses. Self-enhancement values were positively related to the choice of both homologous and heterologous techniques, whereas self-transcendence values were strong and positive predictors of adoption. Moreover, a significant moderating role of religiosity in shaping the relations between personal values and attitudes towards heterologous techniques emerged: at low levels of self-enhancement values, highly religious participants had a more negative attitude towards heterologous techniques compared to participants with low religiosity. However, self-transcendence values predicted a more positive attitude towards heterologous techniques among participants with low religiosity. Findings showed the link between personal values and attitudes towards assisted reproductive techniques and adoption, along with the role of religiosity in shaping this relation; heterologous techniques were the most controversial option according to participants’ perceptions.
articolo
2020
Canzi, Elena; Danioni, Francesca; Rosnati, Rosa; Scabini, Eugenia; Barni, Daniela
(2020). Attitudes towards procreative options in the event of infertility: The role of personal values and religiosity [journal article - articolo]. In THE OPEN PSYCHOLOGY JOURNAL. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/174908
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
Canzietal_2020_TheOpenPsychologyJournal.pdf

accesso aperto

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione del file 519.03 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
519.03 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/174908
Citazioni
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact