The 'machine for living', so dear to the Modern Movement, has become over the years less and less as a machine and more and more as a living organism. It demands breathing space: dwellings that have gone from being "living cells" to houses, with an outside and neighbours; neighbourhoods that are increasingly configured as communities of practice. The global health emergency that has affected us since the beginning of the 2020s strongly suggests a rethink of the concept of the city: What will be the guiding principles of urban planning in the future? Will fear dictated by what we have experienced or the hope of a better future? a better future? And, with the rise of smart working, a repositioning of preferences for preferences for places to live/work, in time and space: city lights (which change) or green living (and new forms of urban urban)? After the dynamics of concentration that have driven urban urban development in recent years, the wind may be blowing towards a different towards a different balance of the city-countryside pair (insofar as it still holds balance (however much it still holds) between city and countryside.
La “macchina per abitare” cara al Movimento Moderno, si manifesta negli anni sempre meno come macchina e sempre più come organismo vivente. Chiede spazio di respiro: abitazioni che da “cellule abitative” diventano case, con un fuori e dei vicini; quartieri che si configurano sempre più come comunità di pratiche. L’emergenza sanitaria globale che ci ha investiti dagli inizi del 2020 ripropone con forza un ripensamento del concetto di città: quali saranno i principi guida dell’urbanistica del futuro? Vincerà la paura dettata da ciò che abbiamo vissuto o la speranza di un avvenire migliore? E, con lo scatto dello smart working, un riposizionamento delle preferenze per i luoghi della vita/lavoro, nel tempo e nello spazio: luci della città (che cambia) o green living (e nuove forme dell’urbano diffuso)? Dopo le dinamiche di concentrazione che hanno sospinto lo sviluppo urbano degli ultimi anni, il vento potrebbe soffiare verso assetti di un diverso equilibrio della coppia (per quanto ancora tenga) città-campagna.
(2021). Ripartendo dalla poesia in scatola . Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/181060
Ripartendo dalla poesia in scatola
Adobati, Fulvio
2021-01-01
Abstract
The 'machine for living', so dear to the Modern Movement, has become over the years less and less as a machine and more and more as a living organism. It demands breathing space: dwellings that have gone from being "living cells" to houses, with an outside and neighbours; neighbourhoods that are increasingly configured as communities of practice. The global health emergency that has affected us since the beginning of the 2020s strongly suggests a rethink of the concept of the city: What will be the guiding principles of urban planning in the future? Will fear dictated by what we have experienced or the hope of a better future? a better future? And, with the rise of smart working, a repositioning of preferences for preferences for places to live/work, in time and space: city lights (which change) or green living (and new forms of urban urban)? After the dynamics of concentration that have driven urban urban development in recent years, the wind may be blowing towards a different towards a different balance of the city-countryside pair (insofar as it still holds balance (however much it still holds) between city and countryside.File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Adobati_CIAM_1949-2019.pdf
Solo gestori di archivio
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file
1.67 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.67 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo