Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) is an increasingly prevalent clinical condition associated with cardiovascular aging, characterized by different pathophysiological mechanisms and poor outcomes. In this manuscript, we analysed the main differences in terms of updated diagnostic criteria and patients' selection in the most recent HFpEF trials. Recent algorithm purposed for HFpEF diagnosis, does not reflect common criteria adopted in clinical trials. Patients included in the larger studies experienced different characteristics in terms of clinical presentation and echocardiographic features. Current concerns complicate results interpretation and could hypothesize different stages of disease progression, rather than different cardiac phenotypes. Both the lack of diagnostic standardization and the population heterogeneity, might explain why trials investigating the effects of different therapeutic interventions failed to show improved outcomes for patients with HFpEF. Accordingly, we propose to exceed current view mainly based on the morphological adaptations evaluating patients' characterisation, their cardiovascular risk, associated diseases, and structural features consistent with disease progression. Detailed clinical, imaging and biological characterisation of this population, along with the identification of mechanisms linked with disease progression and prognosis, would allow for tailored treatments and provide important mechanistic insights into the complex HFpEF pathophysiology.

(2021). Current gaps in HFpEF trials: Time to reconsider patients' selection and to target phenotypes [journal article - articolo]. In PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/189660

Current gaps in HFpEF trials: Time to reconsider patients' selection and to target phenotypes

Caravita, Sergio;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) is an increasingly prevalent clinical condition associated with cardiovascular aging, characterized by different pathophysiological mechanisms and poor outcomes. In this manuscript, we analysed the main differences in terms of updated diagnostic criteria and patients' selection in the most recent HFpEF trials. Recent algorithm purposed for HFpEF diagnosis, does not reflect common criteria adopted in clinical trials. Patients included in the larger studies experienced different characteristics in terms of clinical presentation and echocardiographic features. Current concerns complicate results interpretation and could hypothesize different stages of disease progression, rather than different cardiac phenotypes. Both the lack of diagnostic standardization and the population heterogeneity, might explain why trials investigating the effects of different therapeutic interventions failed to show improved outcomes for patients with HFpEF. Accordingly, we propose to exceed current view mainly based on the morphological adaptations evaluating patients' characterisation, their cardiovascular risk, associated diseases, and structural features consistent with disease progression. Detailed clinical, imaging and biological characterisation of this population, along with the identification of mechanisms linked with disease progression and prognosis, would allow for tailored treatments and provide important mechanistic insights into the complex HFpEF pathophysiology.
articolo
2021
Palazzuoli, Alberto; Caravita, Sergio; Paolillo, Stefania; Ghio, Stefano; Tocchetti, Carlo Gabriele; Ruocco, Gaetano; Correale, Michele; Ambrosio, Giu...espandi
(2021). Current gaps in HFpEF trials: Time to reconsider patients' selection and to target phenotypes [journal article - articolo]. In PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/189660
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
1-s2.0-S0033062021000359-main.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 1.83 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.83 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/189660
Citazioni
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact