Heidegger’s entire itinerary is characterised by the search for a living relationship with God, and thus for a “Logos” able to think and name the divine without objectifying its divinity. Heidegger’s “Theological heritage” is crucial for his development of the “question of Being”. Although Heidegger characterizes philosophy as “a-theistic” in principle already in 1922, he continues to consider of great importance a dialogue with a kind of theology that does not objectify God by means of a dogmatic doctrinal system. Distancing himself from neo-scholastic theology, which makes use of Aristotelian notions based on traditional metaphysics, and that, therefore, should be “destroyed”, at the end of the 1920s Heidegger assigns to his existential ontology a “corrective” role towards theology as science of faith. However, from the 1930’s onwards he deems it impossible to talk about God until the “forgetfulness” of the truth of Being is overcome. For this reason, Heidegger understands as task of his thinking the preparation of an authentic experience of divinity. Consequently, he defines his meditation as “corrective” for thinkers and theologians who pretend to exceed the limits of philosophy and theology and who, failing to differentiate the two, end up believing in Being and conceptualizing God.
(2020). Ein 'Logos' für das Sein und den Gott. Heideggers Auseinandersetzung mit der Theologie ab den dreißiger Jahren. I [journal article - articolo]. In STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI. PHILOSOPHIA. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/190755
Ein 'Logos' für das Sein und den Gott. Heideggers Auseinandersetzung mit der Theologie ab den dreißiger Jahren. I
Marafioti, Rosa Maria
2020-01-01
Abstract
Heidegger’s entire itinerary is characterised by the search for a living relationship with God, and thus for a “Logos” able to think and name the divine without objectifying its divinity. Heidegger’s “Theological heritage” is crucial for his development of the “question of Being”. Although Heidegger characterizes philosophy as “a-theistic” in principle already in 1922, he continues to consider of great importance a dialogue with a kind of theology that does not objectify God by means of a dogmatic doctrinal system. Distancing himself from neo-scholastic theology, which makes use of Aristotelian notions based on traditional metaphysics, and that, therefore, should be “destroyed”, at the end of the 1920s Heidegger assigns to his existential ontology a “corrective” role towards theology as science of faith. However, from the 1930’s onwards he deems it impossible to talk about God until the “forgetfulness” of the truth of Being is overcome. For this reason, Heidegger understands as task of his thinking the preparation of an authentic experience of divinity. Consequently, he defines his meditation as “corrective” for thinkers and theologians who pretend to exceed the limits of philosophy and theology and who, failing to differentiate the two, end up believing in Being and conceptualizing God.File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Ein Logos für das Sein und den Gott I.pdf
accesso aperto
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione del file
848.23 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
848.23 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo