We are happy to respond to Bendavid et al. on the matter of their paper [1] (the authors, henceforth). Given the subject matter impacts on lives across the globe, we are pleased to have the opportunity to continue this worthwhile discussion. While the authors have written a response [2] to our initial concerns [3,4,5], we feel that it falls short in a number of key ways, and thus the paper still does not propose a useful assessment of the efficacy of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) against COVID-19.
(2021). Challenges in determining causality: An ongoing critique of Bendavid et al's "Assessing mandatory stay-at-home and business closure effects on the spread of COVID-19." [journal article - articolo]. In EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/190895
Challenges in determining causality: An ongoing critique of Bendavid et al's "Assessing mandatory stay-at-home and business closure effects on the spread of COVID-19."
Zanetti Chini, Emilio;
2021-01-01
Abstract
We are happy to respond to Bendavid et al. on the matter of their paper [1] (the authors, henceforth). Given the subject matter impacts on lives across the globe, we are pleased to have the opportunity to continue this worthwhile discussion. While the authors have written a response [2] to our initial concerns [3,4,5], we feel that it falls short in a number of key ways, and thus the paper still does not propose a useful assessment of the efficacy of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) against COVID-19.File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
ZanettiChini_Challenges_2021.pdf
Solo gestori di archivio
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file
223.7 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
223.7 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo