Challenges in determining causality: An ongoing critique of Bendavid et al's "Assessing mandatory stay-at-home and business closure effects on the spread of COVID-19."

Besançon, Lonni; Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon; Zanetti Chini, Emilio; Fuchs, Hermann; Flahault, Antoine

doi:10.1111/eci.13599

We are happy to respond to Bendavid et al. on the matter of their paper [1] (the authors, henceforth). Given the subject matter impacts on lives across the globe, we are pleased to have the opportunity to continue this worthwhile discussion. While the authors have written a response [2] to our initial concerns [3,4,5], we feel that it falls short in a number of key ways, and thus the paper still does not propose a useful assessment of the efficacy of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) against COVID-19.

(2021). Challenges in determining causality: An ongoing critique of Bendavid et al's "Assessing mandatory stay-at-home and business closure effects on the spread of COVID-19." [journal article - articolo]. In EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/190895

Citazione:	(2021). Challenges in determining causality: An ongoing critique of Bendavid et al's "Assessing mandatory stay-at-home and business closure effects on the spread of COVID-19." [journal article - articolo]. In EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/190895
Titolo:	Challenges in determining causality: An ongoing critique of Bendavid et al's "Assessing mandatory stay-at-home and business closure effects on the spread of COVID-19."
Tipologia specifica:	articolo
Tutti gli autori:	Besançon, Lonni; Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon; Zanetti Chini, Emilio; Fuchs, Hermann; Flahault, Antoine
Data di pubblicazione:	2021
Abstract (eng):	We are happy to respond to Bendavid et al. on the matter of their paper [1] (the authors, henceforth). Given the subject matter impacts on lives across the globe, we are pleased to have the opportunity to continue this worthwhile discussion. While the authors have written a response [2] to our initial concerns [3,4,5], we feel that it falls short in a number of key ways, and thus the paper still does not propose a useful assessment of the efficacy of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) against COVID-19.
Rivista:	EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Nelle collezioni:	1.1.01 Articoli/Saggi in rivista - Journal Articles/Essays

File allegato/i alla scheda:

File	Descrizione	Tipologia	Licenza
ZanettiChini_Challenges_2021.pdf		publisher's version - versione editoriale	Licenza default Aisberg	Testo non consultabile

Pubblicazioni consigliate

Loading suggested articles...

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento:
http://hdl.handle.net/10446/190895

Citazioni