Preliminary high-fidelity simulations of the MTU T161 low pressure turbine cascade with diverging end walls have been performed on massively parallel computational resources with four different high-order methods at outlet isentropic Mach number M2s= 0.601 and two outlet isentropic Reynolds numbers, namely Re2s=90K and Re2s=200K. First the flow regime and the boundary conditions are thoroughly described. The implementation of each method is then briefly introduced before the main results are presented. The main flow features of this test case have been qualitatively highlighted by these simulations. However, discrepancies have been observed quantitatively in terms of separation point on the suction side of the blade, especially at the lowest Reynolds. These simulations relied mainly on a laminar boundary layer at the inlet of the domain, which is likely the root cause of the observed discrepancies. Additional simulations with turbulent boundary layer imposed at the inlet are required to characterize the flow separation based on the turbulence intensity at the inlet.
(2021). Computational Campaign on the MTU T161 Cascade . Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/191935
Computational Campaign on the MTU T161 Cascade
Colombo A.;Bassi F.;Massa F.;
2021-01-01
Abstract
Preliminary high-fidelity simulations of the MTU T161 low pressure turbine cascade with diverging end walls have been performed on massively parallel computational resources with four different high-order methods at outlet isentropic Mach number M2s= 0.601 and two outlet isentropic Reynolds numbers, namely Re2s=90K and Re2s=200K. First the flow regime and the boundary conditions are thoroughly described. The implementation of each method is then briefly introduced before the main results are presented. The main flow features of this test case have been qualitatively highlighted by these simulations. However, discrepancies have been observed quantitatively in terms of separation point on the suction side of the blade, especially at the lowest Reynolds. These simulations relied mainly on a laminar boundary layer at the inlet of the domain, which is likely the root cause of the observed discrepancies. Additional simulations with turbulent boundary layer imposed at the inlet are required to characterize the flow separation based on the turbulence intensity at the inlet.File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
MTUT161_TILDABook.pdf
Solo gestori di archivio
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file
2.19 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.19 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo