In the context of private enforcement, collective redress is assuming an important role at European Union level as a procedural means to protect collective interests. Legislative developments show a twofold approach: a horizontal framework with common principles has been proposed, though with non-binding nature, and sector-specific legislation has introduced collective redress procedures mainly for consumers. However, also in other fields it shall be a viable procedural remedy, such as in the employment context. Rarely, the Court of Justice addressed collective proceedings and private international law issues, mainly related to the jurisdictional regime. Cross-border situations are not specifically addressed in the relevant Regulations, neither among the common principles or in the specific legislation. An exception is the reference to the extension of the application of the existing Regulations included in the Proposal on representative actions for consumer protection. The horizontal and sectoral approaches, including the applicability of the existing private international law rules, particularly on jurisdiction, are thus debated.

(2020). Cross-border Collective Redress and the Jurisdictional Regime: Horizontal vs Sectoral Approach . Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/192158

Cross-border Collective Redress and the Jurisdictional Regime: Horizontal vs Sectoral Approach

Peraro, Cinzia
2020-01-01

Abstract

In the context of private enforcement, collective redress is assuming an important role at European Union level as a procedural means to protect collective interests. Legislative developments show a twofold approach: a horizontal framework with common principles has been proposed, though with non-binding nature, and sector-specific legislation has introduced collective redress procedures mainly for consumers. However, also in other fields it shall be a viable procedural remedy, such as in the employment context. Rarely, the Court of Justice addressed collective proceedings and private international law issues, mainly related to the jurisdictional regime. Cross-border situations are not specifically addressed in the relevant Regulations, neither among the common principles or in the specific legislation. An exception is the reference to the extension of the application of the existing Regulations included in the Proposal on representative actions for consumer protection. The horizontal and sectoral approaches, including the applicability of the existing private international law rules, particularly on jurisdiction, are thus debated.
2020
Peraro, Cinzia
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
Cinzia Peraro 2020 collective redress in Hess Lenaerts.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 6.01 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.01 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/192158
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact