Aisberg: dal 2009 è l'archivio ad accesso aperto dell'Università di Bergamo; dal 2011 è anche l'anagrafe della ricerca di Ateneo.
L'archivio è un'implementazione di IRIS, il sistema informativo per la ricerca sviluppato da Cineca.
EnglishIn addition to being formally defined as a pandemic, COVID-19 has been classified as an “infodemic” and “(mis)infodemic.” As an “infodemic,” the information environment on COVID-19 is constantly evolving, with emerging scientific findings, political responses, media coverage, and individual impressions all shared on social media. Initial positions on behaviors and potential treatments were presented and then discarded because of low efficacy or improper research procedures. Further, there has been a fragmented geopolitical response with differing political systems exhibiting varying approaches to decision making and health outcomes, which has lead to confusion of the public. As a “misinfodemic,” COVID-19 discussions have also attracted actors seeking to share misinformation enabled and exacerbated by social media networks, which include willful distortions as well as conspiracy theories. Combined, this (mis)infodemic can change risk perceptions of travel, resulting in travel patterns based on technological, regulatory, and perceived behavioral homophily.
(2022). Tourism and the COVID-(Mis)infodemic [journal article - articolo]. In JOURNAL OF TRAVEL RESEARCH. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/197678
| Citazione: | (2022). Tourism and the COVID-(Mis)infodemic [journal article - articolo]. In JOURNAL OF TRAVEL RESEARCH. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/197678 | |
| Titolo: | Tourism and the COVID-(Mis)infodemic | |
| Tipologia specifica: | articolo | |
| Tutti gli autori: | William, Nigel L.; Wassler, Philipp; Ferdinand, Nicole | |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2022 | |
| Abstract (eng): | In addition to being formally defined as a pandemic, COVID-19 has been classified as an “infodemic” and “(mis)infodemic.” As an “infodemic,” the information environment on COVID-19 is constantly evolving, with emerging scientific findings, political responses, media coverage, and individual impressions all shared on social media. Initial positions on behaviors and potential treatments were presented and then discarded because of low efficacy or improper research procedures. Further, there has been a fragmented geopolitical response with differing political systems exhibiting varying approaches to decision making and health outcomes, which has lead to confusion of the public. As a “misinfodemic,” COVID-19 discussions have also attracted actors seeking to share misinformation enabled and exacerbated by social media networks, which include willful distortions as well as conspiracy theories. Combined, this (mis)infodemic can change risk perceptions of travel, resulting in travel patterns based on technological, regulatory, and perceived behavioral homophily. | |
| Rivista: | ||
| Nelle collezioni: | 1.1.01 Articoli/Saggi in rivista - Journal Articles/Essays |
File allegato/i alla scheda:
| File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Williams et al.pdf | SAGE's Green Open Access policy, the Accepted Version of the article may be posted in the author's institutional repository and reuse is restricted to non-commercial and no derivative uses | publisher's version - versione editoriale | Licenza default Aisberg | Open AccessVisualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Copyright © 2022