This paper focuses on Italian complex pragmatic markers made up of a conjunction, be it ma ‘but’ or e ‘and’, and a pragmatic deverbal or adverbial marker, such as 'ma dai, ma piantala, evvai, e allora'. Fedriani and Molinelli (2019) described this type of complex marker in terms of a pragmatic dyad, i.e. a two-element construction with a procedural function consisting of a fixed element combined with a number of possible preferential fillers. The fixed element carries the pragmatic value of the resulting dyad, e.g. the interactional contrast with 'ma'. Several schema-compatible fillers add specific pragmatic nuances to this basic value and further specify its functional core; as regards 'ma', the core value of contrast can be shaped in terms of disagreement, counter-expectation, and mock politeness. In this study, the notion of pragmatic dyad is extended to complex markers featuring e as a fixed element, to clarify, and compare, the semantic and pragmatic enrichment of 'ma' and 'e' considered as members of a dyad. This qualitative and quantitative research highlights both the prominence of diamesic variation when describing contemporary Italian pragmatic markers and the importance of the pragmatic dimension, which is capable of capturing the dynamisms of less surveilled registers.
(2021). Congiunzioni e segnali funzionali: la produttività di 'ma' ed 'e' in diadi pragmatiche in italiano [journal article - articolo]. In STORIE E LINGUAGGI. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/200732
Congiunzioni e segnali funzionali: la produttività di 'ma' ed 'e' in diadi pragmatiche in italiano
Molinelli, Piera
2021-01-01
Abstract
This paper focuses on Italian complex pragmatic markers made up of a conjunction, be it ma ‘but’ or e ‘and’, and a pragmatic deverbal or adverbial marker, such as 'ma dai, ma piantala, evvai, e allora'. Fedriani and Molinelli (2019) described this type of complex marker in terms of a pragmatic dyad, i.e. a two-element construction with a procedural function consisting of a fixed element combined with a number of possible preferential fillers. The fixed element carries the pragmatic value of the resulting dyad, e.g. the interactional contrast with 'ma'. Several schema-compatible fillers add specific pragmatic nuances to this basic value and further specify its functional core; as regards 'ma', the core value of contrast can be shaped in terms of disagreement, counter-expectation, and mock politeness. In this study, the notion of pragmatic dyad is extended to complex markers featuring e as a fixed element, to clarify, and compare, the semantic and pragmatic enrichment of 'ma' and 'e' considered as members of a dyad. This qualitative and quantitative research highlights both the prominence of diamesic variation when describing contemporary Italian pragmatic markers and the importance of the pragmatic dimension, which is capable of capturing the dynamisms of less surveilled registers.File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
11_Molinelli_II_bozze_con modifica.pdf
Solo gestori di archivio
Versione:
postprint - versione referata/accettata senza referaggio
Licenza:
Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file
1.36 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.36 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo