Already in 1690 Gilles Ménage’s Historia Mulierum Philosopharum noticed sixty-five women philosophers and classified them according to the school or sect with which each was associated. Yet, until recently, standard histories of philosophy have excluded or undervalued the role of women in the discipline. Some revisionary accounts, such as Waithe’s (A History of Women Philosophers, 1987), have sought to rectify this situation but, in doing so, they have sometimes adopted excessively restrictive criteria for inclusion, such as the survival—direct or indirect—of writings attributable to women. With specific reference to the cultural and material conditions of the ancient world, we consider some alternative approaches to the formation of a canon of women engaged with philosophy, bearing in mind how these are also freighted with consequences for our general conception of what it is to be a philosopher.

(2021). Women Philosophers in Antiquity: Open Questions and Some Results . Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/201308

Women Philosophers in Antiquity: Open Questions and Some Results

Bonelli, Maddalena
2021-01-01

Abstract

Already in 1690 Gilles Ménage’s Historia Mulierum Philosopharum noticed sixty-five women philosophers and classified them according to the school or sect with which each was associated. Yet, until recently, standard histories of philosophy have excluded or undervalued the role of women in the discipline. Some revisionary accounts, such as Waithe’s (A History of Women Philosophers, 1987), have sought to rectify this situation but, in doing so, they have sometimes adopted excessively restrictive criteria for inclusion, such as the survival—direct or indirect—of writings attributable to women. With specific reference to the cultural and material conditions of the ancient world, we consider some alternative approaches to the formation of a canon of women engaged with philosophy, bearing in mind how these are also freighted with consequences for our general conception of what it is to be a philosopher.
2021
Bonelli, Maddalena
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
Women's Perspectives.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 5.18 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.18 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/201308
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact