This paper aims at reviewing literature on mentoring in academia, with a focus on mentoring to enhance women's careers. A significant gender imbalance in science persists, and mentoring has been recognized as an important instrument for fostering academic women's careers and addressing such imbalance. However, often the benefits of mentoring are taken for granted. This review aims to unpack the concept of mentoring, understand which trends characterize the mentoring literature, and analyze the evidence; moreover, it aims to discover potential gaps and propose a model to guide future research. A systematic approach is undertaken: four relevant search engines, covering more disciplines, are browsed to look for empirical studies on mentoring academic women from 1990 to March 2017. The review shows that there are some problems. First, there is no agreement on the definition of mentoring. Then, often studies are poorly grounded from a theoretical and conceptual perspective. In addition to the dominating research stream, focused on the benefits for the mentee, three other streams are consolidating: impact on the mentors, the role of group mentoring, and mentoring as an instrument to change institutions. At the end, we propose a model to guide future studies built on a longitudinal perspective.

(2017). Does mentoring make a difference for women academics? Evidence from the literature and a guide for future research [journal article - articolo]. In JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN GENDER STUDIES. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/201779

Does mentoring make a difference for women academics? Evidence from the literature and a guide for future research

Meschitti, Viviana;
2017-01-01

Abstract

This paper aims at reviewing literature on mentoring in academia, with a focus on mentoring to enhance women's careers. A significant gender imbalance in science persists, and mentoring has been recognized as an important instrument for fostering academic women's careers and addressing such imbalance. However, often the benefits of mentoring are taken for granted. This review aims to unpack the concept of mentoring, understand which trends characterize the mentoring literature, and analyze the evidence; moreover, it aims to discover potential gaps and propose a model to guide future research. A systematic approach is undertaken: four relevant search engines, covering more disciplines, are browsed to look for empirical studies on mentoring academic women from 1990 to March 2017. The review shows that there are some problems. First, there is no agreement on the definition of mentoring. Then, often studies are poorly grounded from a theoretical and conceptual perspective. In addition to the dominating research stream, focused on the benefits for the mentee, three other streams are consolidating: impact on the mentors, the role of group mentoring, and mentoring as an instrument to change institutions. At the end, we propose a model to guide future studies built on a longitudinal perspective.
articolo
2017
Meschitti, Viviana; Smith, Helen Lawton
(2017). Does mentoring make a difference for women academics? Evidence from the literature and a guide for future research [journal article - articolo]. In JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN GENDER STUDIES. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/201779
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
5_Meschitti&Lawton Smith_Journal of Research in Gender Studies.pdf

accesso aperto

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 2.13 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.13 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/201779
Citazioni
  • Scopus 43
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact