Improving explanation has always been a crucial challenge for scholars of any social science, particularly in areas of study, such as entrepreneurship and family business, whose progress depends on the generation of both scientific and usable knowledge. Recently, a microfoundational perspective has been recommended as a promising avenue for achieving a better understanding of entrepreneurial and family business phenomena. In this paper we assess such claim by contrasting microfoundational explanation with the dominant models in the field, namely variance and process approaches. We claim that microfoundational explanation can help progress in the field when used as an adjunct to variance and process models. We defend our claim first by advancing a complementarity thesis according to which the microfoundational model addresses causal questions that are distinct from, and supplemental to, the questions addressed by variance and process models. Second, we argue that microfoundational explanation contributes scientific and usable knowledge by pursuing goals that obey both practical and epistemic interests, namely intervening, contextualizing, sequencing, and strategizing.

(2021). Microfoundational Explanation: A Complementary Model for Entrepreneurship in Family Business [conference presentation (poster/slideshow) - intervento a convegno (poster/slideshow)]. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/202139

Microfoundational Explanation: A Complementary Model for Entrepreneurship in Family Business

Ruzzene, Attilia;Brumana, Mara
2021-01-01

Abstract

Improving explanation has always been a crucial challenge for scholars of any social science, particularly in areas of study, such as entrepreneurship and family business, whose progress depends on the generation of both scientific and usable knowledge. Recently, a microfoundational perspective has been recommended as a promising avenue for achieving a better understanding of entrepreneurial and family business phenomena. In this paper we assess such claim by contrasting microfoundational explanation with the dominant models in the field, namely variance and process approaches. We claim that microfoundational explanation can help progress in the field when used as an adjunct to variance and process models. We defend our claim first by advancing a complementarity thesis according to which the microfoundational model addresses causal questions that are distinct from, and supplemental to, the questions addressed by variance and process models. Second, we argue that microfoundational explanation contributes scientific and usable knowledge by pursuing goals that obey both practical and epistemic interests, namely intervening, contextualizing, sequencing, and strategizing.
intervento a convegno (poster/slideshow)
Presentazione Power Point
Ruzzene, Attilia; Brumana, Mara
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
RSA AiiG_RUZZENE ^0 BRUMANA.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 802.86 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
802.86 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/202139
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact