This paper discusses from a legal perspective how, over the past years, the SRB has performed against the main goals it was supposed to accomplish, in light of the decisions taken so far (looking backwards) and points to some of the challenges ahead (looking forward). These include inconsistencies in the implementation of the BRRD/SRMR regime, in particular with regard to the ‘dichotomy’ between liquidation and resolution, the resulting fragmentation along national lines, the interpretation of the public interest test, and the complexity and inefficiency of the existing system of ‘multi-layered’ litigation. The ongoing work of the SSM and the SRM and the development of Banking Union need to continue to address the ‘fault lines’ in their design and provide for a better alignment of the triggers for resolution and liquidation and greater transparency on the outcome of resolution planning.
(2019). Stock Take of the SRB’s activities over the past years: What to Improve and Focus On? [research project report - rapporto di ricerca]. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/205322
Stock Take of the SRB’s activities over the past years: What to Improve and Focus On?
Bodellini, Marco
2019-01-01
Abstract
This paper discusses from a legal perspective how, over the past years, the SRB has performed against the main goals it was supposed to accomplish, in light of the decisions taken so far (looking backwards) and points to some of the challenges ahead (looking forward). These include inconsistencies in the implementation of the BRRD/SRMR regime, in particular with regard to the ‘dichotomy’ between liquidation and resolution, the resulting fragmentation along national lines, the interpretation of the public interest test, and the complexity and inefficiency of the existing system of ‘multi-layered’ litigation. The ongoing work of the SSM and the SRM and the development of Banking Union need to continue to address the ‘fault lines’ in their design and provide for a better alignment of the triggers for resolution and liquidation and greater transparency on the outcome of resolution planning.File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
IPOL_STU(2019)634392_EN copy.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file
529.86 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
529.86 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo