This paper discusses from a legal perspective how, over the past years, the SRB has performed against the main goals it was supposed to accomplish, in light of the decisions taken so far (looking backwards) and points to some of the challenges ahead (looking forward). These include inconsistencies in the implementation of the BRRD/SRMR regime, in particular with regard to the ‘dichotomy’ between liquidation and resolution, the resulting fragmentation along national lines, the interpretation of the public interest test, and the complexity and inefficiency of the existing system of ‘multi-layered’ litigation. The ongoing work of the SSM and the SRM and the development of Banking Union need to continue to address the ‘fault lines’ in their design and provide for a better alignment of the triggers for resolution and liquidation and greater transparency on the outcome of resolution planning.

(2019). Stock Take of the SRB’s activities over the past years: What to Improve and Focus On? [research project report - rapporto di ricerca]. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/205322

Stock Take of the SRB’s activities over the past years: What to Improve and Focus On?

Bodellini, Marco
2019-01-01

Abstract

This paper discusses from a legal perspective how, over the past years, the SRB has performed against the main goals it was supposed to accomplish, in light of the decisions taken so far (looking backwards) and points to some of the challenges ahead (looking forward). These include inconsistencies in the implementation of the BRRD/SRMR regime, in particular with regard to the ‘dichotomy’ between liquidation and resolution, the resulting fragmentation along national lines, the interpretation of the public interest test, and the complexity and inefficiency of the existing system of ‘multi-layered’ litigation. The ongoing work of the SSM and the SRM and the development of Banking Union need to continue to address the ‘fault lines’ in their design and provide for a better alignment of the triggers for resolution and liquidation and greater transparency on the outcome of resolution planning.
rapporto di ricerca
Study requested by the ECON committee - Economic Governance Support Unit (EGOV): Directorate-General for Internal Policies of the Union, PE 634.392
2019
Lastra, Rosa María; Russo, Costanza A.; Bodellini, Marco
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
IPOL_STU(2019)634392_EN copy.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.
Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 529.86 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
529.86 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/205322
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact