The chapter highlights the distinction between reflection (as a socio-cognitive capacity and disposition to think about one's work) and reflexivity (as a process which questions the ways in which people socially give sense to reality), exploring how organizational reflexivity can work as a practice. A case study exemple is presented to underpin the way we can detect and put in evidence tacit and implicit knowledge. Different ways of using reflexive practice are discussed in order to develop condictions for a reflexive exercise on such embedded and distributes dimensions.

(2015). Between viewing and transforming: how reflexivity as practice works . Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/209874

Between viewing and transforming: how reflexivity as practice works

Scaratti, Giuseppe;
2015-01-01

Abstract

The chapter highlights the distinction between reflection (as a socio-cognitive capacity and disposition to think about one's work) and reflexivity (as a process which questions the ways in which people socially give sense to reality), exploring how organizational reflexivity can work as a practice. A case study exemple is presented to underpin the way we can detect and put in evidence tacit and implicit knowledge. Different ways of using reflexive practice are discussed in order to develop condictions for a reflexive exercise on such embedded and distributes dimensions.
2015
Scaratti, Giuseppe; Ripamonti, Silvio
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
riflessività.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 3.6 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.6 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/209874
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact