The genealogical reconstructions of the word and concept of screen in media archaeology have often stressed that “surface for presenting images” is a relatively late meaning that came into use in the first half of the nineteenth century, associated with the spread of pre-cinema devices such as the phantasmagoria and magic lantern. The original meaning would instead refer primarily to concepts of concealment and protection. I believe, however, that another, broader – and hence inevitably unsystematic, incomplete and simplifying – exploration of the concept of screen is required, to establish that it embodies two coexisting meanings: an instrument of ‘protection’ or ‘concealment,’ on the one hand, and of ‘showing’ or ‘monstration,’ on the other. Some episodes in the history of this concept, which we shall discuss, show how we should not be too hasty in jumping to the conclusion that the nineteenth century was a crucial time of discontinuity, of breaking with the past, a “point of diffraction” between two incompatible meanings (to use Foucault’s terminology). The aim is not merely to court controversy but to make a profitable contribution to an archaeology of the screen that demonstrates the intimate relationship between the two orders of meaning. This relationship may even seem obvious sometimes but problematic and theoretically fertile at others. Perhaps it lays the foundations for the concept itself: the screen probably needs to be considered not as an object but as a function, or rather as a combination of functions.

(2016). Intersections between Showing and Concealment in the History of the Concept of Screen . Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/210001

Intersections between Showing and Concealment in the History of the Concept of Screen

Avezzù, Giorgio
2016-01-01

Abstract

The genealogical reconstructions of the word and concept of screen in media archaeology have often stressed that “surface for presenting images” is a relatively late meaning that came into use in the first half of the nineteenth century, associated with the spread of pre-cinema devices such as the phantasmagoria and magic lantern. The original meaning would instead refer primarily to concepts of concealment and protection. I believe, however, that another, broader – and hence inevitably unsystematic, incomplete and simplifying – exploration of the concept of screen is required, to establish that it embodies two coexisting meanings: an instrument of ‘protection’ or ‘concealment,’ on the one hand, and of ‘showing’ or ‘monstration,’ on the other. Some episodes in the history of this concept, which we shall discuss, show how we should not be too hasty in jumping to the conclusion that the nineteenth century was a crucial time of discontinuity, of breaking with the past, a “point of diffraction” between two incompatible meanings (to use Foucault’s terminology). The aim is not merely to court controversy but to make a profitable contribution to an archaeology of the screen that demonstrates the intimate relationship between the two orders of meaning. This relationship may even seem obvious sometimes but problematic and theoretically fertile at others. Perhaps it lays the foundations for the concept itself: the screen probably needs to be considered not as an object but as a function, or rather as a combination of functions.
2016
Avezzu', Giorgio
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
Avezzù, Intersections between Showing and Concealment.pdf

accesso aperto

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione del file 1.23 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.23 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/210001
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact