This essay argues for the moral legitimacy of suicide from a liberal perspective, starting with Hume's outstanding essay and ending with Camus, who argues that the sovereignty to decide one's own death coincides with a definition of freedom. The thesis is based on Mill's "harm principle" and is compared with "soft" (Feinberg) and "hard" versions of paternalism, with the "nudge movement" and with openly paternalistic or communitarian positions, with the aim of refuting them
(2021). Suicidio e libertà [journal article - articolo]. In RIFD. RIVISTA INTERNAZIONALE DI FILOSOFIA DEL DIRITTO. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/214971
Suicidio e libertà
Tincani, Persio
2021-01-01
Abstract
This essay argues for the moral legitimacy of suicide from a liberal perspective, starting with Hume's outstanding essay and ending with Camus, who argues that the sovereignty to decide one's own death coincides with a definition of freedom. The thesis is based on Mill's "harm principle" and is compared with "soft" (Feinberg) and "hard" versions of paternalism, with the "nudge movement" and with openly paternalistic or communitarian positions, with the aim of refuting themFile | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Suicidio_e_liberta_Rivista_internazional.pdf
Solo gestori di archivio
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file
378.11 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
378.11 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo