"No" is one of the first ten words used by children and embodies the first form of linguistic negation. Despite its early occurrence, the details of its acquisition remain largely unknown. The circumstance that "no" cannot be construed as a label for perceptible objects or events puts it outside the scope of most modern accounts of language acquisition. Moreover, most symbol grounding architectures will struggle to ground the word due to its non-referential character. The presented work extends symbol grounding to encompass affect and motivation. In a study involving the child-like robot iCub, we attempt to illuminate the acquisition process of negation words. The robot is deployed in speech-wise unconstrained interaction with participants acting as its language teachers. The results corroborate the hypothesis that affect or volition plays a pivotal role in the acquisition process. Negation words are prosodically salient within prohibitive utterances and negative intent interpretations such that they can be easily isolated from the teacher's speech signal. These words subsequently may be grounded in negative affective states. However, observations of the nature of prohibition and the temporal relationships between its linguistic and extra-linguistic components raise questions over the suitability of Hebbian-type algorithms for certain types of language grounding.

(2019). Robots Learning to Say “No”: Prohibition and Rejective Mechanisms in Acquisition of Linguistic Negation [journal article - articolo]. In ACM TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/215739

Robots Learning to Say “No”: Prohibition and Rejective Mechanisms in Acquisition of Linguistic Negation

Lehmann, Hagen;
2019-01-01

Abstract

"No" is one of the first ten words used by children and embodies the first form of linguistic negation. Despite its early occurrence, the details of its acquisition remain largely unknown. The circumstance that "no" cannot be construed as a label for perceptible objects or events puts it outside the scope of most modern accounts of language acquisition. Moreover, most symbol grounding architectures will struggle to ground the word due to its non-referential character. The presented work extends symbol grounding to encompass affect and motivation. In a study involving the child-like robot iCub, we attempt to illuminate the acquisition process of negation words. The robot is deployed in speech-wise unconstrained interaction with participants acting as its language teachers. The results corroborate the hypothesis that affect or volition plays a pivotal role in the acquisition process. Negation words are prosodically salient within prohibitive utterances and negative intent interpretations such that they can be easily isolated from the teacher's speech signal. These words subsequently may be grounded in negative affective states. However, observations of the nature of prohibition and the temporal relationships between its linguistic and extra-linguistic components raise questions over the suitability of Hebbian-type algorithms for certain types of language grounding.
articolo
2019
Förster, Frank; Saunders, Joe; Lehmann, Hagen; Nehaniv, Chrystopher L.
(2019). Robots Learning to Say “No”: Prohibition and Rejective Mechanisms in Acquisition of Linguistic Negation [journal article - articolo]. In ACM TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/215739
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
3359618,opt.pdf

accesso aperto

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 838.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
838.73 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/215739
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact