We investigate how individuals react to different types of asymmetries in experimental two-player Tullock contests where contestants expend resources to win a prize. We compare the effects of three different sources of asymmetry: resources, abilities and possible outcomes. We find that overall competitive effort is greatest in the presence of asymmetric abilities. Unlike other forms, asymmetry in abilities elicits a very aggressive reaction from disadvantaged players relative to their advantaged opponents. The Quantal Response Equilibrium (QRE) suggests that financial incentives are less salient in the presence of a biased contest procedure. We explore asymmetric abilities further in a second study that varies the degree of asymmetry. We find that advantaged players exploit their privileged position while disadvantaged players exhibit volatile behavior, either giving up or matching their opponents. We conclude that a desire to win drives behavior in this asymmetric setting. ? 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

(2021). Inequality and competitive effort: The roles of asymmetric resources, opportunity and outcomes [journal article - articolo]. In JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/228055

Inequality and competitive effort: The roles of asymmetric resources, opportunity and outcomes

Fallucchi, F.;
2021

Abstract

We investigate how individuals react to different types of asymmetries in experimental two-player Tullock contests where contestants expend resources to win a prize. We compare the effects of three different sources of asymmetry: resources, abilities and possible outcomes. We find that overall competitive effort is greatest in the presence of asymmetric abilities. Unlike other forms, asymmetry in abilities elicits a very aggressive reaction from disadvantaged players relative to their advantaged opponents. The Quantal Response Equilibrium (QRE) suggests that financial incentives are less salient in the presence of a biased contest procedure. We explore asymmetric abilities further in a second study that varies the degree of asymmetry. We find that advantaged players exploit their privileged position while disadvantaged players exhibit volatile behavior, either giving up or matching their opponents. We conclude that a desire to win drives behavior in this asymmetric setting. ? 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
articolo
Fallucchi, F.; Ramalingam, A.; Rockenbach, B.; Waligora, M.
(2021). Inequality and competitive effort: The roles of asymmetric resources, opportunity and outcomes [journal article - articolo]. In JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/228055
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
1-s2.0-S0167268121000779-main.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 886.2 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
886.2 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/10446/228055
Citazioni
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact