The 2003 Italian corporate law reform, which established one-tier and two-tier boards for listed and unlisted joint stock companies, introduced alternative corporate governance systems. In addition to the traditional model, which, at least in its basic features, continues to be used by the Italian legislator, the two “alternative” models of corporate governance generated by the 2003 reform differ in terms of their methods of appointment of managing and controlling bodies. Taking into account the surprisingly limited adoption of the new systems introduced by the reform after five years, this work implements regression analysis in order to compare the choice of corporate governance system in Italian unlisted firms: the corporations with best performances in terms of return of assets have continued to use the traditional system; moreover, firms with less concentrated ownership structure and the lowest proportion of individual shareholders have adopted a two-tier model. These findings support the preference of a two-tier board system for pyramidal structured companies hold by family groups.

(2013). The Choice of Alternative Corporate Governance Systems: Ownership Structures and Performance in Italian unlisted Firms in 2008 [journal article - articolo]. In INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRADE AND GLOBAL MARKETS. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/229479

The Choice of Alternative Corporate Governance Systems: Ownership Structures and Performance in Italian unlisted Firms in 2008

Pellegrini, Laura;
2013

Abstract

The 2003 Italian corporate law reform, which established one-tier and two-tier boards for listed and unlisted joint stock companies, introduced alternative corporate governance systems. In addition to the traditional model, which, at least in its basic features, continues to be used by the Italian legislator, the two “alternative” models of corporate governance generated by the 2003 reform differ in terms of their methods of appointment of managing and controlling bodies. Taking into account the surprisingly limited adoption of the new systems introduced by the reform after five years, this work implements regression analysis in order to compare the choice of corporate governance system in Italian unlisted firms: the corporations with best performances in terms of return of assets have continued to use the traditional system; moreover, firms with less concentrated ownership structure and the lowest proportion of individual shareholders have adopted a two-tier model. These findings support the preference of a two-tier board system for pyramidal structured companies hold by family groups.
articolo
Bellavite Pellegrini, Carlo; Pellegrini, Laura; Sironi, Emiliano
(2013). The Choice of Alternative Corporate Governance Systems: Ownership Structures and Performance in Italian unlisted Firms in 2008 [journal article - articolo]. In INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRADE AND GLOBAL MARKETS. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/229479
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
2013_ _IJTGM_The choice of alternative corporate governance system_IJTGM60302_Bellavite Pellegrini Pellegrini Sironi.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 255.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
255.96 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/229479
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact