Teachers play a fundamental role in guaranteeing an inclusive teaching practice using Educational Robotics (ER). However, they may hold genderdifferentiated views of their students’ academic abilities and aptitudes in ER. This quasi-experimental test investigated gender-differentiated attributions and behavioral intentions of N = 158 Italian learning support teachers (LST) answering a questionnaire at the end of a post-graduate ER course. Participants read one of two vignettes regarding a student failing an ER activity in class: (1) a boy; or (2) a girl. Then participants answered items based on measures that assessed their gender stereotypes, attributions for the child’s failure, and hypothetical intentions to use ER with the same child. Results of moderation analyses indicated that the failure of the depicted girl was attributed to internal, stable and uncontrollable causes (i.e., low abilities in ER) to a greater extent than the same failure of the depicted boy, among LST with high levels of gender stereotypes. Furthermore, LST with high levels of gender stereotypes declared less intention to use ER with the depicted girl as compared with the depicted boy.

(2024). Brief Research Report: Teachers’ Gender-Differentiated Attributions [journal article - articolo]. In THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/231809

Brief Research Report: Teachers’ Gender-Differentiated Attributions

Di Battista, Silvia;Pivetti, Monica;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Teachers play a fundamental role in guaranteeing an inclusive teaching practice using Educational Robotics (ER). However, they may hold genderdifferentiated views of their students’ academic abilities and aptitudes in ER. This quasi-experimental test investigated gender-differentiated attributions and behavioral intentions of N = 158 Italian learning support teachers (LST) answering a questionnaire at the end of a post-graduate ER course. Participants read one of two vignettes regarding a student failing an ER activity in class: (1) a boy; or (2) a girl. Then participants answered items based on measures that assessed their gender stereotypes, attributions for the child’s failure, and hypothetical intentions to use ER with the same child. Results of moderation analyses indicated that the failure of the depicted girl was attributed to internal, stable and uncontrollable causes (i.e., low abilities in ER) to a greater extent than the same failure of the depicted boy, among LST with high levels of gender stereotypes. Furthermore, LST with high levels of gender stereotypes declared less intention to use ER with the depicted girl as compared with the depicted boy.
articolo
2024
DI BATTISTA, Silvia; Pivetti, Monica; Bozzi, Gilda
(2024). Brief Research Report: Teachers’ Gender-Differentiated Attributions [journal article - articolo]. In THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/231809
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
Brief Research Report Teachers Gender Differentiated Attributions.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 1.42 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.42 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/231809
Citazioni
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact