In a seminal essay from 1967, historian Lynn White, Jr., argues that the profound cause of today’s environmental crisis is the anthropocentric perspective, embedded in the Christian “roots” of Western tradition, which assigns an intrinsic value to human beings solely. Though White’s thesis relies on a specific tradition – the so-called “dominant anthropocentric reading” of Genesis – the idea that anthropocentrism provides the ideological basis for the exploitation of nature has proven tenacious, and even today is the ground assumption of the historical and philosophical debate on environmental issues. This paper investigates the possible impact on this debate of a different kind of anthropocentrism: Aristotle’s philosophy of biology. The topic is controversial, since it involves opposing traditions of interpretations; for the purpose of the present paper, the dominant anthropocentric reading of Gen. 1.28 will be analyzed, and the relevant passages from Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium, showing his commitment to a more sophisticated anthropocentric perspective, will be reviewed.

(2021). The Place of Human Beings in the Natural Environment: Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology and the Dominant Anthropocentric Reading of Genesis [journal article - articolo]. In JOURNAL OF ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/232709

The Place of Human Beings in the Natural Environment: Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology and the Dominant Anthropocentric Reading of Genesis

Mingucci, Giulia
2021-01-01

Abstract

In a seminal essay from 1967, historian Lynn White, Jr., argues that the profound cause of today’s environmental crisis is the anthropocentric perspective, embedded in the Christian “roots” of Western tradition, which assigns an intrinsic value to human beings solely. Though White’s thesis relies on a specific tradition – the so-called “dominant anthropocentric reading” of Genesis – the idea that anthropocentrism provides the ideological basis for the exploitation of nature has proven tenacious, and even today is the ground assumption of the historical and philosophical debate on environmental issues. This paper investigates the possible impact on this debate of a different kind of anthropocentrism: Aristotle’s philosophy of biology. The topic is controversial, since it involves opposing traditions of interpretations; for the purpose of the present paper, the dominant anthropocentric reading of Gen. 1.28 will be analyzed, and the relevant passages from Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium, showing his commitment to a more sophisticated anthropocentric perspective, will be reviewed.
articolo
Mingucci, Giulia
(2021). The Place of Human Beings in the Natural Environment: Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology and the Dominant Anthropocentric Reading of Genesis [journal article - articolo]. In JOURNAL OF ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/232709
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
01. Mingucci in JAP 2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione del file 1.12 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.12 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/232709
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact