The Court in its decision n. 106 of 2017 declared the constitutional illegitimacy of articles 4 and 5 of the Calabria regional law of 20 April 2016, establishing which dental services can be practiced without authorization or certified reporting and which should instead require an authorization regime. The decision is in continuity with the constitutional case law regarding the specifications of the agreement between the State and the Region, called “Plans for re-entry”, which is the inter- posed norm of a law of coordination of public finance pursuant to art. 117 of the Constitution. The decision confirms the strictly binding nature of the Regions of l. n. 191 December 23, 2009, which determined the obligation by the Regions that sign the “Plans for re-entry” to comply with it in all its parts. The Court has held that the protection of health was the constitutional parameter violated by the regional law approved in contrast with the interposed rules contained in the legislative decree 30 December 1992 n. 502. Finally, sentence n. 106 of 2017 established the role of the “Commissario ad Acta” as a decisive figure in the implementation of the repayment “Plans for re-entry” in the in- terpretation stage. A role of guarantee, so to say, from potential interferences by the regional bodies.

(2018). La difficile “metabolizzazione” regionale del ruolo del Commissario ad acta nell’attuazione dei piani di rientro e la ferma posizione della Corte costituzionale [journal article - articolo]. In CORTI SUPREME E SALUTE. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/238970

La difficile “metabolizzazione” regionale del ruolo del Commissario ad acta nell’attuazione dei piani di rientro e la ferma posizione della Corte costituzionale

Patane, Andrea
2018-01-01

Abstract

The Court in its decision n. 106 of 2017 declared the constitutional illegitimacy of articles 4 and 5 of the Calabria regional law of 20 April 2016, establishing which dental services can be practiced without authorization or certified reporting and which should instead require an authorization regime. The decision is in continuity with the constitutional case law regarding the specifications of the agreement between the State and the Region, called “Plans for re-entry”, which is the inter- posed norm of a law of coordination of public finance pursuant to art. 117 of the Constitution. The decision confirms the strictly binding nature of the Regions of l. n. 191 December 23, 2009, which determined the obligation by the Regions that sign the “Plans for re-entry” to comply with it in all its parts. The Court has held that the protection of health was the constitutional parameter violated by the regional law approved in contrast with the interposed rules contained in the legislative decree 30 December 1992 n. 502. Finally, sentence n. 106 of 2017 established the role of the “Commissario ad Acta” as a decisive figure in the implementation of the repayment “Plans for re-entry” in the in- terpretation stage. A role of guarantee, so to say, from potential interferences by the regional bodies.
articolo
2018
Patane', Andrea
(2018). La difficile “metabolizzazione” regionale del ruolo del Commissario ad acta nell’attuazione dei piani di rientro e la ferma posizione della Corte costituzionale [journal article - articolo]. In CORTI SUPREME E SALUTE. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/238970
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
(2018) A. Patanè, La difficile metabolizzazione.pdf

accesso aperto

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 170.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
170.44 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/238970
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact