The use of digital applications like in mobile phone or on the web to perform psychophysical measurements led to the introduction of algorithms to guide the users in test execution. In this paper we show four algorithms, two already well known: STRICTN and PEST, and a two that we propose: PESTN and BESTN. All the algorithms aim at estimating the level of a psychophysical capability by performing a sequence of simple tests; starting from initial level N, the test is executed until the target level is reached. They differ in the choice of the next steps in the sequences and the stopping condition. We have simulated the application of the algorithms and we have compared them by answering a set of research questions. Finally, we provide guidelines to choose the best algorithm based on the test goal. We found that while STRICTN provides optimal results, it requires the largest number of steps, and this may hinder its use; PESTN can overcome these limits without compromising the final results.

(2022). Evaluation of Algorithms to Measure a Psychophysical Threshold Using Digital Applications . Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/240549

Evaluation of Algorithms to Measure a Psychophysical Threshold Using Digital Applications

Bonfanti, Silvia;Gargantini, Angelo
2022-01-01

Abstract

The use of digital applications like in mobile phone or on the web to perform psychophysical measurements led to the introduction of algorithms to guide the users in test execution. In this paper we show four algorithms, two already well known: STRICTN and PEST, and a two that we propose: PESTN and BESTN. All the algorithms aim at estimating the level of a psychophysical capability by performing a sequence of simple tests; starting from initial level N, the test is executed until the target level is reached. They differ in the choice of the next steps in the sequences and the stopping condition. We have simulated the application of the algorithms and we have compared them by answering a set of research questions. Finally, we provide guidelines to choose the best algorithm based on the test goal. We found that while STRICTN provides optimal results, it requires the largest number of steps, and this may hinder its use; PESTN can overcome these limits without compromising the final results.
2022
Bonfanti, Silvia; Gargantini, Angelo Michele
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
SI_HEALTHINF_2021_CCIS.pdf

Open Access dal 02/01/2024

Versione: postprint - versione referata/accettata senza referaggio
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 208.54 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
208.54 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
978-3-031-20664-1_8.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 393.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
393.73 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/240549
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact