The rhetoric of open government data (OGD) promises that data transparency will lead to multiple public benefits: economic and social innovation, civic participation, public -private collaboration, and public accountability. In reality much less has been accomplished in practice than advocates have hoped. OGD research to address this gap tends to fall into two streams one that focuses on data publication and re-use for purposes of innovation, and one that views publication as a stimulus for civic participation and government accountability - with little attention to whether or how these two views interact. In this paper we use an ecosystem perspective to explore this question. Through an exploratory case study we show how two related cycles of influences can flow from open data publication. The first addresses transparency for innovation goals, the second addresses larger issues of data use for public engagement and greater government accountability. Together they help explain the potential and also the barriers to reaching both kinds of goals.

(2016). Open government data ecosystems: Linking transparency for innovation with transparency for participation and accountability . Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/253170

Open government data ecosystems: Linking transparency for innovation with transparency for participation and accountability

Reggi, Luigi;
2016-01-01

Abstract

The rhetoric of open government data (OGD) promises that data transparency will lead to multiple public benefits: economic and social innovation, civic participation, public -private collaboration, and public accountability. In reality much less has been accomplished in practice than advocates have hoped. OGD research to address this gap tends to fall into two streams one that focuses on data publication and re-use for purposes of innovation, and one that views publication as a stimulus for civic participation and government accountability - with little attention to whether or how these two views interact. In this paper we use an ecosystem perspective to explore this question. Through an exploratory case study we show how two related cycles of influences can flow from open data publication. The first addresses transparency for innovation goals, the second addresses larger issues of data use for public engagement and greater government accountability. Together they help explain the potential and also the barriers to reaching both kinds of goals.
luigi.reggi@unibg.it
2016
Inglese
Electronic Government: 15th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2016, Guimarães, Portugal, September 5-8, 2016, Proceedings
Scholl, Hans Jochen; Glassey, Olivier; Janssen, Marijn; Klievink, Bram; Lindgren, Ida; Parycek, Peter; Tambouris, Efthimios; Wimmer, Maria A.; Janowski, Tomasz; Sá Soares, Delfina;
978-3-319-44420-8
9820
74
86
cartaceo
online
Switzerland
Cham
Springer
EGOV 2016: 15th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, Guimarães, Portugal, 5–8 September 2016
15th
Guimarães (Portugal)
5–8 September 2016
Settore SPS/04 - Scienza Politica
Settore SECS-P/07 - Economia Aziendale
Settore SECS-P/06 - Economia Applicata
Open government data; Ecosystems; Transparency; Innovation; Participation; Accountability;
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
2
Reggi, Luigi; Dawes, Sharon
1.4 Contributi in atti di convegno - Contributions in conference proceedings::1.4.01 Contributi in atti di convegno - Conference presentations
open
Non definito
273
(2016). Open government data ecosystems: Linking transparency for innovation with transparency for participation and accountability . Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/253170
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
Reggi_EGOV 2016.pdf

accesso aperto

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione del file 700.65 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
700.65 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/253170
Citazioni
  • Scopus 55
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 41
social impact