This essay analyses the use of the term/concept hilasterion (‘propitiatorium’, i.e. the cover of ark of Covenant) in the hypomnematic corpus by Philo of alexandria. This subject needs to be examined in relationship with the greek translation of the Septuagint and the exegesis of the Hebrew kapporeth ; so it will be argued that here Philo deals with semitic thought more than with the categories of greek philosophy, since the real and bodily presence of god on hilasterion differs ontologically from any allegoric interpretation: only a sound Hebrew contextualisation of the theme as šekhînâ might take away this concern. as a result it means that, speculatively, there does not exist Philo Græcus only but this coexists with a sort of often neglected Philo Hebraicus too, when greek allegory and allegorism fail to make sense, just as in the case of the special point of view of hilasterion, due to its semitic nature not totally compressible into greek forma mentis.
(2020). Intorno al theologhema della שכינה e all’antiallegorismo dello ἱλαστήριον presso Filone Alessandrino [journal article - articolo]. In CHORA. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/261751
Intorno al theologhema della שכינה e all’antiallegorismo dello ἱλαστήριον presso Filone Alessandrino
Ottobrini, Tiziano
2020-01-01
Abstract
This essay analyses the use of the term/concept hilasterion (‘propitiatorium’, i.e. the cover of ark of Covenant) in the hypomnematic corpus by Philo of alexandria. This subject needs to be examined in relationship with the greek translation of the Septuagint and the exegesis of the Hebrew kapporeth ; so it will be argued that here Philo deals with semitic thought more than with the categories of greek philosophy, since the real and bodily presence of god on hilasterion differs ontologically from any allegoric interpretation: only a sound Hebrew contextualisation of the theme as šekhînâ might take away this concern. as a result it means that, speculatively, there does not exist Philo Græcus only but this coexists with a sort of often neglected Philo Hebraicus too, when greek allegory and allegorism fail to make sense, just as in the case of the special point of view of hilasterion, due to its semitic nature not totally compressible into greek forma mentis.File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
23_Tiziano F. Ottobrini(2).pdf
Solo gestori di archivio
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file
367.38 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
367.38 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo