This article examines the reasons that drive companies to leave Social Accountability 8000 (SA8000)—the main auditable corporate social responsibility standard—and which alternative paths they undertake after the abandonment. As decertification from SA8000 is an under-researched phenomenon, an exploratory approach based on the analysis of 15 multi-country/industry companies has been adopted. Findings show that firms leave SA8000 for several reasons including the reduction of commercial advantages, paperwork overload, and complexities in orders and suppliers management. Our investigation recognizes decertification drivers that are recurring in other standards as well as new ones specific to SA8000. For what concerns the post-decertification paths, we observe that firms pursue three distinct exit strategies (i.e., adoption of an alternative initiative/standard; no adoption of any alternative social standard/initiative, but still respect some SA8000 requirements; no adoption of any alternative social standard/initiative and stop taking care of SA8000 requirements).

(2023). Out of social accountability: Reasons and alternative paths for SA8000 decertification [journal article - articolo]. In CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/271822

Out of social accountability: Reasons and alternative paths for SA8000 decertification

Podrecca, Matteo;
2023-01-01

Abstract

This article examines the reasons that drive companies to leave Social Accountability 8000 (SA8000)—the main auditable corporate social responsibility standard—and which alternative paths they undertake after the abandonment. As decertification from SA8000 is an under-researched phenomenon, an exploratory approach based on the analysis of 15 multi-country/industry companies has been adopted. Findings show that firms leave SA8000 for several reasons including the reduction of commercial advantages, paperwork overload, and complexities in orders and suppliers management. Our investigation recognizes decertification drivers that are recurring in other standards as well as new ones specific to SA8000. For what concerns the post-decertification paths, we observe that firms pursue three distinct exit strategies (i.e., adoption of an alternative initiative/standard; no adoption of any alternative social standard/initiative, but still respect some SA8000 requirements; no adoption of any alternative social standard/initiative and stop taking care of SA8000 requirements).
articolo
2023
Marcuzzi, Irene; Podrecca, Matteo; Sartor, Marco; Nassimbeni, Guido
(2023). Out of social accountability: Reasons and alternative paths for SA8000 decertification [journal article - articolo]. In CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/271822
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
Marcuzzi et al., 2023.pdf

accesso aperto

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione del file 1.67 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.67 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/271822
Citazioni
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact