Providing a reusable methodology for the evaluation of covering array generation utilities and apply it to a corpus of such tools, obtaining an overview of supported features and constraints, performance, output size, file formats, and practical considerations that may ease or hinder adoption.Analysis of supported capabilities, input and output formats, and constraints, followed by an experimental evaluation of eight covering array generation tools, two of which were provided in updated versions, against a corpus of 295 publicly available benchmark models in six categories, producing arrays of strength two to six.Capabilities, particularly constraint support, vary widely amongst competitors. Metaheuristic algorithms, commonly focused on postoptimization, tend to produce small arrays at the cost of performance. Approaches based on the In-Parameter-Order paradigm offer a good balance between speed and output size that may prove conducive to real-world adoption.The choice of a covering array generation utility should be based on specific requirements related to the use case. Nevertheless, our evaluation identifies some candidates - CAgen, ACTS, and APPTS - which lead the field in terms of overall score. Others, such as PICT, offer unique features; however, a lack of standardization may lead to vendor lock-in.

(2024). State of the CArt: evaluating covering array generators at scale [journal article - articolo]. In INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON SOFTWARE TOOLS FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/274349

State of the CArt: evaluating covering array generators at scale

Bombarda, Andrea;Gargantini, Angelo;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Providing a reusable methodology for the evaluation of covering array generation utilities and apply it to a corpus of such tools, obtaining an overview of supported features and constraints, performance, output size, file formats, and practical considerations that may ease or hinder adoption.Analysis of supported capabilities, input and output formats, and constraints, followed by an experimental evaluation of eight covering array generation tools, two of which were provided in updated versions, against a corpus of 295 publicly available benchmark models in six categories, producing arrays of strength two to six.Capabilities, particularly constraint support, vary widely amongst competitors. Metaheuristic algorithms, commonly focused on postoptimization, tend to produce small arrays at the cost of performance. Approaches based on the In-Parameter-Order paradigm offer a good balance between speed and output size that may prove conducive to real-world adoption.The choice of a covering array generation utility should be based on specific requirements related to the use case. Nevertheless, our evaluation identifies some candidates - CAgen, ACTS, and APPTS - which lead the field in terms of overall score. Others, such as PICT, offer unique features; however, a lack of standardization may lead to vendor lock-in.
articolo
2024
Leithner, M.; Bombarda, Andrea; Wagner, M.; Gargantini, Angelo Michele; Simos, D. E.
(2024). State of the CArt: evaluating covering array generators at scale [journal article - articolo]. In INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON SOFTWARE TOOLS FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/274349
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
s10009-024-00745-2.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 2.04 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.04 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/274349
Citazioni
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact