Romanian and the Romance and Greek varieties of the extreme south of Italy show various degrees of diachronic and diatopic microvariation in the loss and retreat of the infinitive, whilst displaying at the same time a high degree of overall structural uniformity in their parallel preservation of the (bare) infinitive in: (1) restructuring contexts; (2) infinitival relatives; and (3) negative imperatives. On the surface, there is nothing a priori to suggest that these three contexts should be connected in any way. Yet the discussion below demonstrates how these three uses can be reduced to a single structural explanation which views the infinitive as a reduced clausal constituent (viz. v-VP) generated in a monoclausal structure selected in all cases by a modal, temporal or aspectual auxiliary which is phonologically overt in (1), but oscillates between overt and covert phonological realizations in (2) and (3) in accordance with crosslinguistic variation. The result is a unified analysis which allows us to capture the distribution of (bare) infinitival complementation in all the relevant varieties quite simply in terms of a so-called restructuring configuration in line with Hill’s (2013a,b, 2017) intuition that the Romanian (and more generally Balkan) bare infinitive instantiates a monoclausal structure selected by a T-related auxiliary.

(2023). THE FINAL STRONGHOLD OF THE INFINITIVE: (SILENT) MODALS IN ROMANIAN AND SOUTHERN ITALY [journal article - articolo]. In REVUE ROUMAINE DE LINGUISTIQUE. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/278420

THE FINAL STRONGHOLD OF THE INFINITIVE: (SILENT) MODALS IN ROMANIAN AND SOUTHERN ITALY

Ledgeway, Adam
2023-01-01

Abstract

Romanian and the Romance and Greek varieties of the extreme south of Italy show various degrees of diachronic and diatopic microvariation in the loss and retreat of the infinitive, whilst displaying at the same time a high degree of overall structural uniformity in their parallel preservation of the (bare) infinitive in: (1) restructuring contexts; (2) infinitival relatives; and (3) negative imperatives. On the surface, there is nothing a priori to suggest that these three contexts should be connected in any way. Yet the discussion below demonstrates how these three uses can be reduced to a single structural explanation which views the infinitive as a reduced clausal constituent (viz. v-VP) generated in a monoclausal structure selected in all cases by a modal, temporal or aspectual auxiliary which is phonologically overt in (1), but oscillates between overt and covert phonological realizations in (2) and (3) in accordance with crosslinguistic variation. The result is a unified analysis which allows us to capture the distribution of (bare) infinitival complementation in all the relevant varieties quite simply in terms of a so-called restructuring configuration in line with Hill’s (2013a,b, 2017) intuition that the Romanian (and more generally Balkan) bare infinitive instantiates a monoclausal structure selected by a T-related auxiliary.
articolo
2023
Ledgeway, Adam Noel
(2023). THE FINAL STRONGHOLD OF THE INFINITIVE: (SILENT) MODALS IN ROMANIAN AND SOUTHERN ITALY [journal article - articolo]. In REVUE ROUMAINE DE LINGUISTIQUE. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/278420
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
2023 Ledgeway Final stronghold infinitive Romanian SIDs ItaloGreek.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 458.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
458.02 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/278420
Citazioni
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact