Inequality is an inherent part of our lives: we see it in the distribution of incomes, talents, citations, to name a few. However, its intensity varies across environments: there are systems where the available resources are relatively evenly distributed but also where a small group of items or agents controls the majority of assets. Numerous indices for quantifying the degree of inequality have been proposed but in general, they work quite differently. We recently observed (Siudem et al., 2020) that many rank-size distributions might be approximated by a time-dependent agent-based model involving a mixture of preferential (rich-get-richer) and accidental (sheer chance) attachment. In this paper, we point out its relationship to an iterative process that generates rank distributions of any length and a predefined level of inequality, as measured by the Gini index. We prove that, under our model, the Gini, Bonferroni, De Vergottini, and Hoover indices are equivalent for samples of similar sizes. Given one of them, we can recreate the value of another measure. Thanks to the obtained formulae, we can also understand how they depend on the sample size. An empirical analysis of a large database of citation records in economics (RePEc) yields a good match with our theoretical derivations.

(2024). Equivalence of inequality indices in the three-dimensional model of informetric impact [journal article - articolo]. In JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/281549

Equivalence of inequality indices in the three-dimensional model of informetric impact

Bertoli Barsotti, Lucio;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Inequality is an inherent part of our lives: we see it in the distribution of incomes, talents, citations, to name a few. However, its intensity varies across environments: there are systems where the available resources are relatively evenly distributed but also where a small group of items or agents controls the majority of assets. Numerous indices for quantifying the degree of inequality have been proposed but in general, they work quite differently. We recently observed (Siudem et al., 2020) that many rank-size distributions might be approximated by a time-dependent agent-based model involving a mixture of preferential (rich-get-richer) and accidental (sheer chance) attachment. In this paper, we point out its relationship to an iterative process that generates rank distributions of any length and a predefined level of inequality, as measured by the Gini index. We prove that, under our model, the Gini, Bonferroni, De Vergottini, and Hoover indices are equivalent for samples of similar sizes. Given one of them, we can recreate the value of another measure. Thanks to the obtained formulae, we can also understand how they depend on the sample size. An empirical analysis of a large database of citation records in economics (RePEc) yields a good match with our theoretical derivations.
articolo
2024
BERTOLI BARSOTTI, Lucio; Gagolewski, M.; Siudem, G.; Żogała-Siudem, B.
(2024). Equivalence of inequality indices in the three-dimensional model of informetric impact [journal article - articolo]. In JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/281549
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
1-s2.0-S1751157724000798-main.pdf

Solo gestori di archivio

Versione: publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza: Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file 7.83 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
7.83 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/281549
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact