Anarchy is the most radical form of critique of power. This article compares Michel Foucault’s and Giorgio Agamben’s conceptions of anarchy, with the aim of tracing the different political ontologies that underpin them. I will argue that Foucauldian political ontology is similar to institutionalism, while Agamben’s is avowedly destituent. Finally, I will show the aporias inherent in Agamben’s proposal.

(2023). L’anarchico. Una postura critica, due differenti ontologie politiche. Foucault e Agamben [journal article - articolo]. In ETICA & POLITICA. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/286289

L’anarchico. Una postura critica, due differenti ontologie politiche. Foucault e Agamben

Crosato C
2023-01-01

Abstract

Anarchy is the most radical form of critique of power. This article compares Michel Foucault’s and Giorgio Agamben’s conceptions of anarchy, with the aim of tracing the different political ontologies that underpin them. I will argue that Foucauldian political ontology is similar to institutionalism, while Agamben’s is avowedly destituent. Finally, I will show the aporias inherent in Agamben’s proposal.
articolo
2023
Crosato, Carlo
(2023). L’anarchico. Una postura critica, due differenti ontologie politiche. Foucault e Agamben [journal article - articolo]. In ETICA & POLITICA. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/286289
File allegato/i alla scheda:
Non ci sono file allegati a questa scheda.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/286289
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact