Anarchy is the most radical form of critique of power. This article compares Michel Foucault’s and Giorgio Agamben’s conceptions of anarchy, with the aim of tracing the different political ontologies that underpin them. I will argue that Foucauldian political ontology is similar to institutionalism, while Agamben’s is avowedly destituent. Finally, I will show the aporias inherent in Agamben’s proposal.
(2023). L’anarchico. Una postura critica, due differenti ontologie politiche. Foucault e Agamben [journal article - articolo]. In ETICA & POLITICA. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/286289
L’anarchico. Una postura critica, due differenti ontologie politiche. Foucault e Agamben
Crosato, Carlo
2023-01-01
Abstract
Anarchy is the most radical form of critique of power. This article compares Michel Foucault’s and Giorgio Agamben’s conceptions of anarchy, with the aim of tracing the different political ontologies that underpin them. I will argue that Foucauldian political ontology is similar to institutionalism, while Agamben’s is avowedly destituent. Finally, I will show the aporias inherent in Agamben’s proposal.File allegato/i alla scheda:
| File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
CCrosato_L’anarchico. Una postura critica, due differenti ontologie politiche.pdf
accesso aperto
Versione:
publisher's version - versione editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione del file
213.19 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
213.19 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo
