We study the effect of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on employment across US commuting zones over the period 2000-2020. A simple model shows that AI can automate jobs or complement workers, and illustrates how to estimate its effect by exploiting variation in a novel measure of local exposure to AI: job growth in AI-related professions built from detailed occupational data. Using a shift-share instrument that combines industry-level AI adoption with local industry employment, we estimate robust negative effects of AI exposure on employment across commuting zones and time. We find that AI’s impact is different from other capital and technologies, and that it works through services more than manufacturing. Moreover, the employment effect is especially negative for low-skill and production workers, while it turns positive for workers at the top of the wage distribution and for those in STEM occupations. These results are consistent with the view that AI has contributed to the automation of jobs and to widen inequality.
(2024). Artificial Intelligence and Jobs: Evidence from US Commuting Zones [journal article - articolo]. In ECONOMIC POLICY. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10446/291085
Artificial Intelligence and Jobs: Evidence from US Commuting Zones
Bonfiglioli, Alessandra;Crinò, Rosario;
2024-11-25
Abstract
We study the effect of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on employment across US commuting zones over the period 2000-2020. A simple model shows that AI can automate jobs or complement workers, and illustrates how to estimate its effect by exploiting variation in a novel measure of local exposure to AI: job growth in AI-related professions built from detailed occupational data. Using a shift-share instrument that combines industry-level AI adoption with local industry employment, we estimate robust negative effects of AI exposure on employment across commuting zones and time. We find that AI’s impact is different from other capital and technologies, and that it works through services more than manufacturing. Moreover, the employment effect is especially negative for low-skill and production workers, while it turns positive for workers at the top of the wage distribution and for those in STEM occupations. These results are consistent with the view that AI has contributed to the automation of jobs and to widen inequality.File | Dimensione del file | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Accepted-Manuscript.pdf
embargo fino al 01/12/2025
Descrizione: Accepted manuscript. This article has been published in a revised form in 'Economic Policy' [http://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiae059]].
Versione:
postprint - versione referata/accettata senza referaggio
Licenza:
Licenza default Aisberg
Dimensione del file
510.33 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
510.33 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo