In December 2010, a comprehensive reform (Law 240/2010, or ‘Gelmini reform’) changed the institutional governance and internal organization of Italian state universities. This paper describes the new legal framework and evaluates how it has affected the power-­‐sharing arrangement and coordination mechanisms in the Italian higher education system thus far, by analysing the following governance dimensions: external regulation, external guidance, competition, academic self-­‐ governance, and managerial self-­‐governance. Though Law 240 was presented as a fundamental change with respect to the traditional Italian governance regime, based on detailed state regulation and academic self-­‐governance, it did not have any substantial impact on power distribution. The policy suffers from strong path dependency, presenting only reactions to solve previous inefficiencies, and stimulating adaptive behaviours of Italian universities. Law 240 does not depict a new governance regime for the Italian higher education, and bureaucratic fulfilment remains the dominant approach for universities.

(2013). Higher Education Reform in Italy: Tightening Regulation Instead of Steering at a Distance [conference presentation - intervento a convegno]. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10446/29416

Higher Education Reform in Italy: Tightening Regulation Instead of Steering at a Distance

DONINA, Davide;MEOLI, Michele;PALEARI, Stefano
2013-12-01

Abstract

In December 2010, a comprehensive reform (Law 240/2010, or ‘Gelmini reform’) changed the institutional governance and internal organization of Italian state universities. This paper describes the new legal framework and evaluates how it has affected the power-­‐sharing arrangement and coordination mechanisms in the Italian higher education system thus far, by analysing the following governance dimensions: external regulation, external guidance, competition, academic self-­‐ governance, and managerial self-­‐governance. Though Law 240 was presented as a fundamental change with respect to the traditional Italian governance regime, based on detailed state regulation and academic self-­‐governance, it did not have any substantial impact on power distribution. The policy suffers from strong path dependency, presenting only reactions to solve previous inefficiencies, and stimulating adaptive behaviours of Italian universities. Law 240 does not depict a new governance regime for the Italian higher education, and bureaucratic fulfilment remains the dominant approach for universities.
dic-2013
Donina, Davide; Meoli, Michele; Paleari, Stefano
File allegato/i alla scheda:
File Dimensione del file Formato  
HER_proceedings_2013 - HER in Italy.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: publisher's version - versione dell'editore
Dimensione del file 470.85 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
470.85 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Aisberg ©2008 Servizi bibliotecari, Università degli studi di Bergamo | Terms of use/Condizioni di utilizzo

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10446/29416
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact